On climate change skepticism and denial in tourism

被引:48
作者
Hall, C. M. [1 ,2 ]
Amelung, B. [3 ]
Cohen, S. [4 ]
Eijgelaar, E. [5 ]
Gossling, S. [6 ]
Higham, J. [7 ]
Leemans, R. [3 ]
Peeters, P. [5 ]
Ram, Y. [8 ]
Scott, D. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Management Mkt & Entrepreneurship, Canterbury, New Zealand
[2] Univ Oulu, Dept Geog, SF-90100 Oulu, Finland
[3] Wageningen Univ, Environm Syst Anal Grp, NL-6700 AP Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Surrey, Sch Hospitality & Tourism Management, Guildford GU2 5XH, Surrey, England
[5] NHTV Breda Univ Appl Sci, Ctr Sustainable Tourism & Transport, Breda, Netherlands
[6] Lund Univ, Dept Serv Management, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
[7] Univ Otago, Dept Tourism, Otago, New Zealand
[8] Ashkelon Acad Coll, Tel Aviv, Israel
[9] Univ Waterloo, Dept Geog & Environm Management, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
climate change denial; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); climate change consensus; climate models; climate change mitigation; greenhouse gas emissions; SUSTAINABLE TOURISM; SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS; INTERNATIONAL TOURISM; TEMPERATURE-CHANGES; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; SCIENCE; VARIABILITY; POLICY; FUTURE; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1080/09669582.2014.953544
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The period leading to and immediately after the release of the IPCC's fifth series of climate change assessments saw substantial efforts by climate change denial interests to portray anthropogenic climate change (ACC) as either unproven theory or a negligible contribution to natural climate variability, including the relationship between tourism and climate change. This paper responds to those claims by stressing that the extent of scientific consensus suggests that human-induced warming of the climate system is unequivocal. Second, it responds in the context of tourism research and ACC, highlighting tourism's significant contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, as well as climate change's potential impacts on tourism at different scales. The paper exposes the tactics used in ACC denial papers to question climate change science by referring to non-peer-reviewed literature, outlier studies, and misinterpretation of research, as well as potential links to think tanks and interest groups. The paper concludes that climate change science does need to improve its communication strategies but that the world-view of some individuals and interests likely precludes acceptance. The connection between ACC and sustainability illustrates the need for debate on adaptation and mitigation strategies, but that debate needs to be grounded in scientific principles not unsupported skepticism.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 25
页数:22
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]   Expert credibility in climate change [J].
Anderegg, William R. L. ;
Prall, James W. ;
Harold, Jacob ;
Schneider, Stephen H. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (27) :12107-12109
[2]   The Ivory Lighthouse: communicating climate change more effectively [J].
Anderegg, William R. L. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2010, 101 (3-4) :655-662
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Climate change and tourism: Responding to global challenges
[4]  
[Anonymous], THE MONTHLY AUG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, The hockey stick and the climate wars: Dispatches from the front lines
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Towards a low carbon travel and tourism sector
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NATURE GEOSCIENCE, V7, P157
[8]  
[Anonymous], EC HUM WELL BEING
[9]  
[Anonymous], 24 CRITICAL ERRORS T
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P1261