Public Health Practice vs Research: Implications for Preparedness and Disaster Research Review by State Health Department IRBs

被引:11
|
作者
Perlman, David [1 ]
机构
[1] E4, Eclipse Ethics Educ Enterprises, Philadelphia, PA 19101 USA
关键词
institutional review boards; public health preparedness; public health practice;
D O I
10.1097/DMP.0b013e318187310c
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Under the current US Department of Health and Human Services regulatory and ethical system for research involving human subjects, research is defined in terms of several key concepts: intent, systematic investigation, and generalizability. If an investigator engages in a systematic investigation designed or intended to contribute to generalizable knowledge, then he or she is engaged in research. If that research involves living individuals and the investigator will either interact or intervene with people or obtain their identifiable personal information, then the research must be prospectively reviewed by an institutional review board (IRB), a federally mandated committee that ensures the ethical and regulatory appropriateness of proposed research. In public health institutions, and especially at state departments of health, this definition of research may prove vexing for determining when particular public health activities must be reviewed by IRBs. This article outlines several reasons for such vexation and 2 key responses from major public health stakeholders. In the current climate of public health preparedness initiatives at state health departments for disasters and bioterrorism, how research is defined vis-a-vis public health interventions may add even more confusion to preparedness initiatives and pose difficulties in determining when IRB review and the added protections it affords are appropriate. This article suggests several practical ways to avoid confusion and attempts to strike a balance between the need for expeditious approvals of research-based responses to public health disasters and to ensure proper protections for human subjects at state health departments. It is hoped that these suggestions can assist not only state health departments but also academically based researchers who either collaborate with those departments or whose research will need to be reviewed by their IRBs. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2008; 2: 185-191)
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 191
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [31] Efforts to locate low-income women for a study on mammography rescreening: Implications for public health practice
    Bobo, Janet Kay
    Shapiro, Jean A.
    Brustrom, Jennifer
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2006, 31 (03) : 249 - 261
  • [32] Efforts to Locate Low-Income Women for a Study on Mammography Rescreening: Implications for Public Health Practice
    Janet Kay Bobo
    Jean A. Shapiro
    Jennifer Brustrom
    Journal of Community Health, 2006, 31 : 249 - 261
  • [33] Variations among Institutional Review Board reviews in a multisite health services research study
    Dziak, K
    Anderson, R
    Sevick, MA
    Weisman, CS
    Levine, DW
    Scholle, SH
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (01) : 279 - 290
  • [34] Practice-Based Research From the Frontlines: Selected Strategies for Reducing Health Disparities and Accelerating Progress Toward Health Equity in the United States
    Hall, Jeffrey E.
    Shah, Gulzar H.
    Bowie, Janice V.
    PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2024, 139 (1_SUPPL) : 3S - 9S
  • [35] HIDDEN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ETHICS: A REVIEW OF THREE HEALTH JOURNALS FROM 2005 THROUGH 2006
    Dubois, James M.
    Volpe, Rebecca L.
    Rangel, Erica K.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2008, 3 (03) : 7 - 18
  • [36] Translating Research-Funded Mobile Produce Market Trials Into Sustained Public Health Programs Food on the Move
    Evans, E. Whitney
    Lyerly, Reece
    Gans, Kim M.
    Alexander Scott, Nicole
    Cohen, Eliza Dexter
    Lawson, Eliza
    Nunn, Amy
    PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2022, 137 (03) : 425 - 430
  • [37] Building a Practice-Based Research Agenda for Wildfire Smoke and Health: A Report of the 2018 Washington Wildfire Smoke Risk Communication Stakeholder Synthesis Symposium
    Errett, Nicole A.
    Roop, Heidi A.
    Pendergrast, Claire
    Kramer, C. Bradley
    Doubleday, Annie
    Kim Anh Tran
    Isaksen, Tania M. Busch
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (13)
  • [38] How the "Understanding Research Evidence" Web-Based Video Series From the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools Contributes to Public Health Capacity to Practice Evidence-Informed Decision Making: Mixed-Methods Evaluation
    Chan, Linda
    Mackintosh, Jeannie
    Dobbins, Maureen
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (09)
  • [39] Institutional Review Boards and post-approval monitoring (PAM) of human research: content analysis of select university (academic health center) web pages across the USA
    Cox, Shereen
    Solbakk, Jan Helge
    Luthardt Jr, Frederick
    Bernabe, Rosemarie D. L. C.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2023, 39 (03) : 341 - 350
  • [40] From Evidence-Based Research to Practice-Based Evidence: Disseminating a Web-Based Computer-Tailored Workplace Sitting Intervention through a Health Promotion Organisation
    De Cocker, Katrien
    Cardon, Greet
    Bennie, Jason A.
    Kolbe-Alexander, Tracy
    De Meester, Femke
    Vandelanotte, Corneel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (05)