Public Health Practice vs Research: Implications for Preparedness and Disaster Research Review by State Health Department IRBs

被引:11
|
作者
Perlman, David [1 ]
机构
[1] E4, Eclipse Ethics Educ Enterprises, Philadelphia, PA 19101 USA
关键词
institutional review boards; public health preparedness; public health practice;
D O I
10.1097/DMP.0b013e318187310c
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Under the current US Department of Health and Human Services regulatory and ethical system for research involving human subjects, research is defined in terms of several key concepts: intent, systematic investigation, and generalizability. If an investigator engages in a systematic investigation designed or intended to contribute to generalizable knowledge, then he or she is engaged in research. If that research involves living individuals and the investigator will either interact or intervene with people or obtain their identifiable personal information, then the research must be prospectively reviewed by an institutional review board (IRB), a federally mandated committee that ensures the ethical and regulatory appropriateness of proposed research. In public health institutions, and especially at state departments of health, this definition of research may prove vexing for determining when particular public health activities must be reviewed by IRBs. This article outlines several reasons for such vexation and 2 key responses from major public health stakeholders. In the current climate of public health preparedness initiatives at state health departments for disasters and bioterrorism, how research is defined vis-a-vis public health interventions may add even more confusion to preparedness initiatives and pose difficulties in determining when IRB review and the added protections it affords are appropriate. This article suggests several practical ways to avoid confusion and attempts to strike a balance between the need for expeditious approvals of research-based responses to public health disasters and to ensure proper protections for human subjects at state health departments. It is hoped that these suggestions can assist not only state health departments but also academically based researchers who either collaborate with those departments or whose research will need to be reviewed by their IRBs. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2008; 2: 185-191)
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 191
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] Status and potential of bacterial genomics for public health practice: a scoping review
    Van Goethem, Nina
    Descamps, Tine
    Devleesschauwer, Brecht
    Roosens, Nancy H. C.
    Boon, Nele A. M.
    Van Oyen, Herman
    Robert, Annie
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (01)
  • [22] Status and potential of bacterial genomics for public health practice: a scoping review
    Nina Van Goethem
    Tine Descamps
    Brecht Devleesschauwer
    Nancy H. C. Roosens
    Nele A. M. Boon
    Herman Van Oyen
    Annie Robert
    Implementation Science, 14
  • [23] Engaging Public Health Critical Race Praxis in Local Social Determinants of Health Research: The Youth Health Equity and Action Research Training Program in Portland, OR-yHEARTPDX
    Petteway, Ryan J.
    Gonzalez, Lourdes A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (13)
  • [24] Integrating Public Health into Climate Change Policy and Planning: State of Practice Update
    Fox, Mary
    Zuidema, Christopher
    Bauman, Bridget
    Burke, Thomas
    Sheehan, Mary
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (18)
  • [25] Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health
    Paula Robeson
    Maureen Dobbins
    Kara DeCorby
    Daiva Tirilis
    BMC Public Health, 10
  • [26] Public Health Requirements and Authorities in State Statutory Disaster Recovery Law: A Cross-Sectional Legal Assessment
    Pendergrast, Claire B.
    Errett, Nicole A.
    HEALTH SECURITY, 2021, 19 (03) : 271 - 279
  • [27] Building State and Local Public Health Capacity in Syndromic Surveillance Through an Online Community of Practice
    Gould, Deborah W.
    Lamb, Emilie
    Dearth, Shandy
    Collier, Krystal
    PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2019, 134 (03) : 223 - 227
  • [28] Assessing public health preparedness and response in the European Union- a review of regional simulation exercises and after action reviews
    Mari Nythun Utheim
    Mohamed Gawad
    Karin Nygård
    Emily Macdonald
    Monica Falk
    Globalization and Health, 19
  • [29] Assessing public health preparedness and response in the European Union- a review of regional simulation exercises and after action reviews
    Utheim, Mari Nythun
    Gawad, Mohamed
    Nygard, Karin
    Macdonald, Emily
    Falk, Monica
    GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2023, 19 (01)
  • [30] The potential for research-based information in public health: Identifying unrecognised information needs
    Louise Forsetlund
    Arild Bjørndal
    BMC Public Health, 1