Wind turbines and coastal recreation demand

被引:86
作者
Landry, Craig E. [1 ,2 ]
Allen, Tom [3 ,4 ]
Cherry, Todd [5 ,6 ]
Whitehead, John C. [5 ]
机构
[1] E Carolina Univ, Dept Econ, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[2] E Carolina Univ, Ctr Sustainable Tourism, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[3] E Carolina Univ, Dept Geog, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[4] E Carolina Univ, RENCI, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[5] Appalachian State Univ, Dept Econ, Boone, NC 28608 USA
[6] CICERO Ctr Int Climate & Environm Res, N-0318 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Coastal; Wind; Turbines; Recreation; Demand; RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENTS; CHOICE; PREFERENCES; FARMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.10.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine the impact of coastal wind turbines on local coastal tourism and recreation for residents of the northeastern coastal counties in North Carolina. A combination of telephone and web survey data are used to assess the impact of coastal wind farms on trip behavior and site choice. Most of the respondents to our telephone survey claim to support offshore wind energy development, and independent survey data suggest that the observed levels of support may be indicative of the broader population in this region. Overall, we find very little impact of coastal wind turbines on aggregate recreational visitation; loss in annual consumer surplus associated with wide spread wind development in the coastal zone is insignificant at $17 (or about 1.5% of annual consumer surplus). Results suggest that NC local coastal tourists are averse to wind farms in the near-shore zone; average compensating variation for wind farms one mile from the shore is estimated at $55 per household. On average, we find no evidence of aversion to wind farms 4 miles out in the ocean, or for wind farms located in coastal estuaries. For all wind farm scenarios, we find evidence of preference heterogeneity some respondents find this appealing while others find it aversive. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 111
页数:19
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]   Inducing patterns of correlation and substitution in repeated logit models of recreation demand [J].
Herriges, JA ;
Phaneuf, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (04) :1076-1090
[12]   The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs [J].
Huber, J ;
Zwerina, K .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1996, 33 (03) :307-317
[13]  
Jude Simon, 2006, 0616 CSERGE EDM
[14]   Valuing a wind farm construction: A contingent valuation study in Greece [J].
Koundouri, Phoebe ;
Kountouris, Yiannis ;
Remoundou, Kyriaki .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (05) :1939-1944
[15]   ON APPROXIMATING THE STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF ELASTICITIES [J].
KRINSKY, I ;
ROBB, AL .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1986, 68 (04) :715-719
[16]   Valuing the Visual Disamenity of Offshore Wind Power Projects at Varying Distances from the Shore: An Application on the Delaware Shoreline [J].
Krueger, Andrew D. ;
Parsons, George R. ;
Firestone, Jeremy .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2011, 87 (02) :268-283
[17]  
Kuhfeld W., 2003, Marketing Research Methods in SAS
[18]   Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from offshore wind farms in Denmark [J].
Ladenburg, Jacob ;
Dubgaard, Alex .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (08) :4059-4071
[19]   Preferences of coastal zone user groups regarding the siting of offshore wind farms [J].
Ladenburg, Jacob ;
Dubgaard, Alex .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 52 (05) :233-242
[20]  
Landry C.E., 2011, PREFERENCE DATA ENV