The simple query "Do you want more pain medication?" is not a reliable way to assess acute pain relief in patients in the emergency department

被引:4
作者
Chauny, Jean-Marc [1 ,3 ]
Marquis, Martin [1 ]
Paquet, Jean [1 ,2 ]
Lavigne, Gilles [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cournoyer, Alexis [3 ]
Manzini, Christiane
Daoust, Raoul [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hop Sacre Coeur, Dept Emergency Med, 5400 Boul Gouin O, Montreal, PQ H4J 1C5, Canada
[2] Hop Sacre Coeur, Ctr Adv Res Sleep Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Fac Med Dent, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
pain; emergency medicine; pain relief; analgesic; VISUAL ANALOG SCALES; CLINICAL-TRIALS; RATING-SCALE; INTENSITY; VALIDATION; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1017/cem.2017.2
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: The management of acute pain constitutes an essential skill of emergency department (ED) physicians. However, the accurate assessment of pain intensity and relief represents a clinically challenging undertaking. Some studies have proposed to define effective pain relief as the patient's refusal for additional analgesic administration. The aim of this study was to verify whether such a refusal is effectively indicative of pain relief. Methods: This prospective cohort study included ED patients who received single or multiple doses of pain medication for an acute pain problem. Patients were evaluated for pain relief using one Likert scale and two dichotomous questions: Is your pain relieved? and Do you want more analgesics? Non-relieved patients were further analysed using a checklist as to the reasons behind their refusal for supplemental pain medication. Results: We have recruited 378 adult patients with a mean age of 50.3 years (+/- 19.1); 60% were women and had an initial mean pain level of 7.3 (+/- 2.0) out of 10. We observed that 68 out of 244 patients who were adequately relieved from pain asked for more analgesics (28%), whereas 51 out of 134 patients who were not relieved from pain refused supplemental drugs (38%). Reasons for refusal included wanting to avoid side effects, feeling sufficiently relieved, and disliking the medication's effects. Conclusion: Over a third of ED patients in acute pain were not relieved but refused supplemental pain medication. Patients have reported legitimate reasons to decline further analgesics, and this refusal cannot be used as an indication of pain relief.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 27
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Bijur PE, 2003, ACAD EMERG MED, V10, P390, DOI 10.1197/aemj.10.4.390
[2]  
Bromm B., 1984, PAIN MEASUREMENT MAN, P3
[3]  
Carr D, 2002, Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ), P1
[4]   Efficacy of an Acute Pain Titration Protocol Driven by Patient Response to a Simple Query: Do You Want More Pain Medication? [J].
Chang, Andrew K. ;
Bijur, Polly E. ;
Holden, Lynne ;
Gallagher, E. John .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 67 (05) :565-572
[5]   Randomized Clinical Trial of the 2 mg Hydromorphone Bolus Protocol Versus the "1+1" Hydromorphone Titration Protocol in Treatment of Acute, Severe Pain in the First Hour of Emergency Department Presentation [J].
Chang, Andrew K. ;
Bijur, Polly E. ;
Lupow, Jason B. ;
Gallagher, E. John .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 62 (04) :304-310
[6]   Evaluating acute pain intensity relief: challenges when using an 11-point numerical rating scale [J].
Chauny, Jean-Marc ;
Paquet, Jean ;
Lavigne, Gilles ;
Marquis, Martin ;
Daoust, Raoul .
PAIN, 2016, 157 (02) :355-360
[7]   Estimation of pain intensity in emergency medicine: A validation study [J].
Daoust, Raoul ;
Beaulieu, Pierre ;
Manzini, Christiane ;
Chauny, Jean-Marc ;
Lavigne, Gilles .
PAIN, 2008, 138 (03) :565-570
[8]   Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations [J].
Dworkin, RH ;
Turk, DC ;
Farrar, JT ;
Haythornthwaite, JA ;
Jensen, MP ;
Katz, NP ;
Kerns, RD ;
Stucki, G ;
Allen, RR ;
Bellamy, N ;
Carr, DB ;
Chandler, J ;
Cowan, P ;
Dionne, R ;
Galer, BS ;
Hertz, S ;
Jadad, AR ;
Kramer, LD ;
Manning, DC ;
Martin, S ;
McCormick, CG ;
McDermott, MP ;
McGrath, P ;
Quessy, S ;
Rappaport, BA ;
Robbins, W ;
Robinson, JP ;
Rothman, M ;
Royal, MA ;
Simon, L ;
Stauffer, JW ;
Stein, W ;
Tollett, J ;
Wernicke, J ;
Witter, J .
PAIN, 2005, 113 (1-2) :9-19
[9]   Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations [J].
Dworkin, Robert H. ;
Turk, Dennis C. ;
Wyrwich, Kathleen W. ;
Beaton, Dorcas ;
Cleeland, Charles S. ;
Farrar, John T. ;
Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A. ;
Jensen, Mark P. ;
Kerns, Robert D. ;
Ader, Deborah N. ;
Brandenburg, Nancy ;
Burke, Laurie B. ;
Cella, David ;
Chandler, Julie ;
Cowan, Penny ;
Dimitrova, Rozalina ;
Dionne, Raymond ;
Hertz, Sharon ;
Jadad, Alejandro R. ;
Katz, Nathaniel P. ;
Kehlet, Henrik ;
Kramer, Lynn D. ;
Manning, Donald C. ;
McCormick, Cynthia ;
McDermott, Michael P. ;
McQuay, Henry J. ;
Patel, Sanjay ;
Porter, Linda ;
Quessy, Steve ;
Rappaport, Bob A. ;
Rauschkolb, Christine ;
Revickl, Dennis A. ;
Rothman, Margaret ;
Schmader, Kenneth E. ;
Stacey, Brett R. ;
Stauffer, Joseph W. ;
Von Stein, Thorsten ;
White, Richard E. ;
Witter, James ;
Zavislc, Stojan .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2008, 9 (02) :105-121
[10]   A Comparison of Change in the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale to a Pain Relief Scale and Global Medication Performance Scale in a Short-term Clinical Trial of Breakthrough Pain Intensity [J].
Farrar, John T. ;
Polomano, Rosemary C. ;
Berlin, Jesse A. ;
Strom, Brian L. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 112 (06) :1464-1472