Aliso Canyon leakage as an analogue for worst case CO2 leakage and quantification of acceptable storage loss

被引:11
|
作者
Lindeberg, Erik [1 ]
Bergmo, Per [1 ]
Torsaeter, Malin [1 ]
Grimstad, Alv-Arne [1 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Petr Res, POB 4763, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
TEMPERATURE; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1914
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Aliso Canyon gas well leakage is used as an analogue to study a possible accident from a CO2 storage site. Because the blowout is the second largest in USA, it can be used as a worst-case blowout analogue for a possible CO2 blowout from an underground CO2 storage. Reservoir modelling and well modelling of the Aliso Canyon case is used to determine the leakage pathway and leakage mechanisms that will mimic the escape history. This data are put in a new model where the gas is replaced by CO2 and a similar accident is simulated. Several factors are different between gas leakage from gas storage and potential leakage from a typical CO2 storage in an aquifer, due to differences in thermodynamic properties and flow properties both along in the leakage pathway and in the porous medium in the storage reservoir. The specific features of the two cases are compared and show that as the risk elements are very different, remediation measures will be different. The escape rate is significant lower for the CO2 scenario than the observed gas escape from Aliso Canyon gas well (4.9 Sm-3/s respectively 21.3 Sm-3/s). While 2.8 % of the stored gas was lost at the Aliso Canyon leak, the corresponding loss from a CO2 well if the facility was used for CO2 storage would be 0.37%. Due to the high density of CO2, the well pressure at the rupture was less than half than for CO2 compared to gas, which will make remediation easier. (C) 2017 The Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:4279 / 4286
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The Leakage Risk Monetization Model for Geologic CO2 Storage
    Bielicki, Jeffrey M.
    Pollak, Melisa F.
    Deng, Hang
    Wilson, Elizabeth J.
    Fitts, Jeffrey P.
    Peters, Catherine A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (10) : 4923 - 4931
  • [12] Leakage risk assessment of a CO2 storage site: A review
    Gholami, Raoof
    Raza, Arshad
    Iglauer, Stefan
    EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2021, 223
  • [13] Atmospheric tomography to locate CO2 leakage at storage sites
    Jenkins, Charles
    Leuning, Ray
    Loh, Zoe
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 3502 - 3509
  • [14] Consequence Study of CO2 Leakage from Ocean Storage
    Pham, Loi Hoang Huy Phuoc
    Rusli, Risza
    Keong, Lau Kok
    PROCEEDING OF 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS ENGINEERING AND ADVANCED MATERIALS (ICPEAM 2016), 2016, 148 : 1081 - 1088
  • [15] Eddy covariance mapping and quantification of surface CO2 leakage fluxes
    Lewicki, Jennifer L.
    Hilley, George E.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 36
  • [16] Uncertainty quantification and risk assessment of CO2 leakage in groundwater aquifers
    Carroll, Susan
    Sun, Yunwei
    Mansoor, Kayyum
    Jones, Edwin
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 242
  • [17] Zero is the only acceptable leakage rate for geologically stored CO2: an editorial comment
    Minh Ha-Duong
    Rodica Loisel
    Climatic Change, 2009, 93 : 311 - 317
  • [18] Dissolved CO2 Injection to Eliminate the Risk of CO2 Leakage in Geologic Carbon Storage
    Vilarrasa, Victor
    Poo, Maria
    De Simone, Silvia
    Carrera, Jesus
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICS, VOL 3: TOWARDS A SUSTAINABLE GEOENVIRONMENT, 2019, : 89 - 96
  • [19] Man-made versus natural CO2 leakage: A 400 k.y. history of an analogue for engineered geological storage of CO2
    Burnside, Neil M.
    Shipton, Zoe K.
    Dockrill, Ben
    Ellam, Rob M.
    GEOLOGY, 2013, 41 (04) : 471 - 474
  • [20] Modelling and Simulation of Mechanisms for Leakage of CO2 from Geological Storage
    Grimstad, Alv-Arne
    Georgescu, Sorin
    Lindeberg, Erik
    Vuillaume, Jean-Francois
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 2511 - 2518