Aliso Canyon leakage as an analogue for worst case CO2 leakage and quantification of acceptable storage loss

被引:11
|
作者
Lindeberg, Erik [1 ]
Bergmo, Per [1 ]
Torsaeter, Malin [1 ]
Grimstad, Alv-Arne [1 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Petr Res, POB 4763, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
TEMPERATURE; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1914
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Aliso Canyon gas well leakage is used as an analogue to study a possible accident from a CO2 storage site. Because the blowout is the second largest in USA, it can be used as a worst-case blowout analogue for a possible CO2 blowout from an underground CO2 storage. Reservoir modelling and well modelling of the Aliso Canyon case is used to determine the leakage pathway and leakage mechanisms that will mimic the escape history. This data are put in a new model where the gas is replaced by CO2 and a similar accident is simulated. Several factors are different between gas leakage from gas storage and potential leakage from a typical CO2 storage in an aquifer, due to differences in thermodynamic properties and flow properties both along in the leakage pathway and in the porous medium in the storage reservoir. The specific features of the two cases are compared and show that as the risk elements are very different, remediation measures will be different. The escape rate is significant lower for the CO2 scenario than the observed gas escape from Aliso Canyon gas well (4.9 Sm-3/s respectively 21.3 Sm-3/s). While 2.8 % of the stored gas was lost at the Aliso Canyon leak, the corresponding loss from a CO2 well if the facility was used for CO2 storage would be 0.37%. Due to the high density of CO2, the well pressure at the rupture was less than half than for CO2 compared to gas, which will make remediation easier. (C) 2017 The Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:4279 / 4286
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Geological sequestration of CO2:: Is leakage unavoidable and acceptable?
    Celia, MA
    Bachu, S
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 477 - 482
  • [2] Quantification techniques for potential CO2 leakage from geological storage sites
    Korre, Anna
    Imrie, Claire E.
    May, Franz
    Beaubien, Stan E.
    Vandermeijer, Vincent
    Persoglia, Sergio
    Golmen, Lars
    Fabriol, Hubert
    Dixon, Tim
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 3413 - 3420
  • [3] A study of wellbore cement alteration controlled by CO2 leakage in a natural analogue for geological CO2 storage
    Hernandez-Rodriguez, Ana
    Montegrossi, Giordano
    Huet, Bruno
    Vaselli, Orlando
    Virgili, Giorgio
    APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2017, 86 : 13 - 25
  • [4] Economics of geological CO2 storage and leakage
    van der Zwaan, Bob
    Gerlagh, Reyer
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2009, 93 (3-4) : 285 - 309
  • [5] Economics of geological CO2 storage and leakage
    Bob van der Zwaan
    Reyer Gerlagh
    Climatic Change, 2009, 93 : 285 - 309
  • [6] Prediction on leakage and rate characteristics of CO2 storage
    Liu, Yongzhong
    Wang, Le
    Zhang, Jialiu
    Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal, 2012, 63 (04): : 1226 - 1233
  • [7] LEAKAGE OF AN AUSTENITIC STEEL CO2 STORAGE TANK
    Jovicic, Radomir
    Sedmak, Aleksandar
    Sedmak, Stojan
    Milovic, Ljubica
    Jovicic, Katarina
    STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND LIFE-INTEGRITET I VEK KONSTRUKCIJA, 2012, 12 (02): : 105 - 108
  • [8] CO2 degassing from a Spanish natural analogue for CO2 storage and leakage: Implications on 222Rn mobility
    Rodrigo-Naharro, Julio
    Santiago Quindos, Luis
    Clemente-Jul, Carmen
    Hassan Mohamud, Abdullahi
    Perez del Villar, Luis
    APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2017, 84 : 297 - 305
  • [9] The Leakage Impact Valuation (LIV) Method for Leakage from Geologic CO2 Storage Reservoirs
    Pollak, Melisa F.
    Bielicki, Jeffrey M.
    Dammel, Joseph A.
    Wilson, Elizabeth J.
    Fitts, Jeffrey P.
    Peters, Catherine A.
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 2819 - 2827