Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: Catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception

被引:52
作者
Plumhans, Cedric [1 ]
Mahnkena, Andreas H. [1 ,3 ]
Ocklenburg, Christina [2 ]
Keil, Sebastian [1 ]
Behrendt, Florian F. [1 ]
Guenther, Rolf W. [1 ]
Schoth, Felix [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Univ Hosp, Inst Med Stat, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[3] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Helmholtz Inst, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
关键词
Interventional radiology; Venous access; TIAP; CENTRAL VENOUS PORTS; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGISTS; ONCOLOGY PATIENTS; CHEST PORTS; VEIN; EXPERIENCE; SYSTEMS; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.010
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the safest and most tolerable method for totally implantable access ports (TIAPs) particularly in regard to patient's pain perception and catheter-related complications. Materials and methods: From January 2007 to October 2008 a subcutaneous TIAP (Bardport, Bard Access System, UT, USA) was implanted in 138 oncological patients (60 male, 78 female; 18-85 years old; mean age of 56 +/- 6 years) by experienced interventional radiologists. 94 TIAP were implanted through the subclavian vein (subclavian group) and 44 TIAP were implanted through the internal jugular vein (jugular group). Intrainterventional pain perception (visual analogue scale from 1 to 10), postinterventional catheter tip migration and radiation dose were documented for each method and implantation side and differences were compared with Wilcoxon t-test. For ordinal variables, comparison of two groups was performed with the Fisher's exact test. Results: No severe periinterventional complication occurred. Inadvertent arterial punctures without serious consequences were reported in one case for the jugular group versus four cases in the subclavian group. Significantly (p < 0.05) lower pain perception, radiation dose and tip migration rate were observed in the jugular group. Catheter occlusions occurred in 4% (n = 4) of the subclavian group versus 2% (n = 1) of the jugular group. The corresponding values for vein thrombosis and catheter dislocation were 3% (n = 3) and 1% (n = 1) in the subclavian group, while none of those complications occurred in the jugular group. Conclusion: Both techniques, the TIAP implantation via fluoroscopy-guided subclavian vein puncture and via ultrasound-guided jugular vein puncture, are feasible and safe. Regarding intrainterventional pain perception, radiation dose, postinterventional catheter tip position and port function the jugular vein puncture under ultrasound guidance seems to be advantageous. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 342
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Ultrasound-guided puncture of the subclavian vein to implant central venous ports
    Adamus, R
    Beyer-Enke, S
    Otte, P
    Loose, R
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2002, 174 (11): : 1450 - 1453
  • [2] Aldrighetti L, 2000, J Vasc Access, V1, P28
  • [3] Evaluation of catheter loops in central venous port systems
    Behrendt, Florian F.
    Wingen, Markus
    Katoh, Marcus
    Guenther, Rolf W.
    Buecker, Arno
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (11) : 777 - 780
  • [4] An alternative technique for totally implantable central venous access devices. A retrospective study of 1311 cases
    Chang, HM
    Hsieh, CB
    Hsieh, HF
    Chen, TW
    Chen, CJ
    Chan, DC
    Yu, JC
    Liu, YC
    Shen, KL
    [J]. EJSO, 2006, 32 (01): : 90 - 93
  • [5] Implantation of central venous ports with catheter insertion via the right internal jugular vein in oncology patients -: single center experience
    Charvat, J.
    Linke, Z.
    Horaekova, M.
    Prausova, J.
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2006, 14 (11) : 1162 - 1165
  • [6] Cil Barbaros Erhan, 2006, Diagn Interv Radiol, V12, P93
  • [7] DEGREGORIO MA, SUBCUTANEOUS PORTS R
  • [8] FUNAKI B, 1997, AM J ROENTGENOL, V169, P431
  • [9] PINCH-OFF SYNDROME - A COMPLICATION OF IMPLANTABLE SUBCLAVIAN VENOUS ACCESS DEVICES
    HINKE, DH
    ZANDTSTASTNY, DA
    GOODMAN, LR
    QUEBBEMAN, EJ
    KRZYWDA, EA
    ANDRIS, DA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 177 (02) : 353 - 356
  • [10] Hovsepian D M, 1993, J Vasc Interv Radiol, V4, P795, DOI 10.1016/S1051-0443(93)71976-4