Vulnerable Women's Perceptions of Individual Versus Group Prenatal Care: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey

被引:10
|
作者
Hetherington, Erin [1 ]
Tough, Suzanne [1 ,2 ]
McNeil, Deborah [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Bayrampour, Hamideh [5 ]
Metcalfe, Amy [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Populat Publ & Aboriginal Hlth Alberta Hlth Serv, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Fac Nursing, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Family Practice, Midwifery Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Calgary, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Prenatal care; CenteringPregnancy; Patient experience; Vulnerable women; MATERNITY EXPERIENCES; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; SOCIAL SUPPORT; ANTENATAL CARE; BIRTH-WEIGHT; PREGNANCY; RISK; SATISFACTION; IMMIGRANT;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-018-2559-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Vulnerable pregnant women (e.g. women with low socio-economic status or recent immigrants) are less likely to receive adequate prenatal care or to attend perinatal education classes. CenteringPregnancy (CP) is a model of group prenatal care which combines assessment, education and support. This study aimed to assess patient experience among vulnerable women in group prenatal care compared to individual care. Methods Women participating in CP at a community-based health centre in urban Alberta were eligible to participate. A convenience sample of women who received individual care at a low-risk maternity clinic served as comparison. Women were asked a series of questions on their prenatal care experience. Demographic and patient responses were compared using Chi square, fisher's exact and t tests. Results Forty-five women accessing CP and 92 women accessing individual care participated. Women in CP were younger, more likely to be single and having their first baby than women in individual care. Women in CP were significantly more likely to report having received enough information on exercise during pregnancy (92 vs. 66%, p = 0.002), breastfeeding (95 vs. 70%, p = 0.002) and baby care (95 vs. 67%, p = 0.001). Women in CP were more likely to report that they felt their prenatal care providers were interested in how the pregnancy was affecting their life (100 vs. 93%, p <= 0.001). Discussion Group prenatal care provides a positive experience and improved information exchange among vulnerable populations. Programs interested in engaging, educating and empowering vulnerable pregnant women may benefit from implementation of group care.
引用
收藏
页码:1632 / 1638
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How effectively do midwives manage the care of obese pregnant women? A cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives
    Biro, Mary Anne
    Cant, Robyn
    Hall, Helen
    Bailey, Carolyn
    Sinni, Suzanne
    East, Christine
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2013, 26 (02) : 119 - 124
  • [42] Women's perceptions of medication use during pregnancy and breastfeeding-A Swedish cross-sectional questionnaire study
    Wolgast, Emelie
    Lindh-Astrand, Lotta
    Lilliecreutz, Caroline
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (07) : 856 - 864
  • [43] China's antenatal care promoting early childhood development: evidence from a cross-sectional survey
    Wu, Tianchen
    Niu, Jieqiong
    Yin, Xiaohan
    Zhao, Chunxia
    Huang, Xiaona
    Wang, Xiaoli
    ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2021, 1493 (01) : 90 - 101
  • [44] Impact of Group vs. Individual Prenatal Care Provision on Women's Knowledge of Pregnancy-Related Topics: An Open, Controlled, Semi-Randomized Community Trial
    Ratzon, Ronit
    Cohen, Arnon
    Hadar, Amnon
    Froimovici, Miron
    Bilenko, Natalya
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (17)
  • [45] Staff perceptions of barriers to self-harm care in the emergency department: A cross-sectional survey study
    Richards, Hannah
    Rajaram, Gowri
    Lamblin, Michelle
    Knott, Jonathan
    Connolly, Owen
    Hetrick, Sarah
    Robinson, Jo
    AUSTRALASIAN EMERGENCY CARE, 2024, 27 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [46] Adherence to physical activity among pregnant women in Southern Italy: results of a cross-sectional survey
    Sarno, Laura
    Borrelli, Paola
    Mennitti, Cristina
    Gentile, Alessandro
    Calvanese, Mariella
    Orlandi, Giuliana
    Angelino, Antonio
    Guida, Maurizio
    Scudiero, Olga
    MIDWIFERY, 2024, 137
  • [47] Determinants of folate status in pregnant women: results from a national cross-sectional survey in Belgium
    Vandevijvere, S.
    Amsalkhir, S.
    Van Oyen, H.
    Moreno-Reyes, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2012, 66 (10) : 1172 - 1177
  • [48] The economic burden of prenatal care for women with rheumatic diseases: a cross-sectional study from a university hospital
    Skinner-Taylor, Cassandra Michele
    Perez-Barbosa, Lorena
    Carrazco-Chapa, Anahi
    Cardenas-de la Garza, Jesus Alberto
    Corral-Trujillo, Maria Eugenia
    Arevalo-Nieto, Fany Rocio
    Guajardo-Aldaco, Andrea Lizbeth
    Aguilar-Leal, Andrea
    Galarza-Delgado, Dionicio Angel
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 42 (09) : 2521 - 2523
  • [49] Respectful maternity care and women's autonomy in decision making in Iceland: Application of scale instruments in a cross-sectional survey
    Mangindin, Edythe L.
    Stoll, Kathrin
    Cadee, Franka
    Gottfredsdottir, Helga
    Swift, Emma M.
    MIDWIFERY, 2023, 123
  • [50] Low birth weight and prenatal care in Colombia: a cross-sectional study
    Ángela María Pinzón-Rondón
    Vivian Gutiérrez-Pinzon
    Humberto Madriñan-Navia
    Jennifer Amin
    Paula Aguilera-Otalvaro
    Alfonso Hoyos-Martínez
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15