Vulnerable Women's Perceptions of Individual Versus Group Prenatal Care: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey

被引:10
|
作者
Hetherington, Erin [1 ]
Tough, Suzanne [1 ,2 ]
McNeil, Deborah [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Bayrampour, Hamideh [5 ]
Metcalfe, Amy [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Populat Publ & Aboriginal Hlth Alberta Hlth Serv, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Fac Nursing, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Family Practice, Midwifery Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Calgary, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Prenatal care; CenteringPregnancy; Patient experience; Vulnerable women; MATERNITY EXPERIENCES; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; SOCIAL SUPPORT; ANTENATAL CARE; BIRTH-WEIGHT; PREGNANCY; RISK; SATISFACTION; IMMIGRANT;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-018-2559-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Vulnerable pregnant women (e.g. women with low socio-economic status or recent immigrants) are less likely to receive adequate prenatal care or to attend perinatal education classes. CenteringPregnancy (CP) is a model of group prenatal care which combines assessment, education and support. This study aimed to assess patient experience among vulnerable women in group prenatal care compared to individual care. Methods Women participating in CP at a community-based health centre in urban Alberta were eligible to participate. A convenience sample of women who received individual care at a low-risk maternity clinic served as comparison. Women were asked a series of questions on their prenatal care experience. Demographic and patient responses were compared using Chi square, fisher's exact and t tests. Results Forty-five women accessing CP and 92 women accessing individual care participated. Women in CP were younger, more likely to be single and having their first baby than women in individual care. Women in CP were significantly more likely to report having received enough information on exercise during pregnancy (92 vs. 66%, p = 0.002), breastfeeding (95 vs. 70%, p = 0.002) and baby care (95 vs. 67%, p = 0.001). Women in CP were more likely to report that they felt their prenatal care providers were interested in how the pregnancy was affecting their life (100 vs. 93%, p <= 0.001). Discussion Group prenatal care provides a positive experience and improved information exchange among vulnerable populations. Programs interested in engaging, educating and empowering vulnerable pregnant women may benefit from implementation of group care.
引用
收藏
页码:1632 / 1638
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Women's perceptions of counselling on pain assessment and management during labour in Finland: A cross-sectional survey
    Hakala, Mervi
    Rantala, Arja
    Polkki, Tarja
    MIDWIFERY, 2022, 114
  • [12] Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Group Versus Individual Prenatal Care on Psychosocial Outcomes
    Smith, Jessica C.
    Heberlein, Emily C.
    Domingue, Amber
    Laboy, Ana
    Britt, Jessica
    Crockett, Amy H.
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2023, 52` (06): : 467 - 480
  • [13] Group prenatal care for pregnant women with opioid use disorder: Preliminary evidence for acceptability and benefits compared with individual prenatal care
    Short, Vanessa L.
    Hand, Dennis J.
    Mancuso, Francesca
    Raju, Amulya
    Sinnott, Jacqueline
    Caldarone, Lindsay
    Rosenthall, Emily
    Liveright, Elizabeth
    Abatemarco, Diane J.
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2024, 51 (01): : 144 - 151
  • [14] Application of Telehealth in Prenatal Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Cross-Sectional Survey of Polish Women
    Jakubowski, Dominik
    Sys, Dorota
    Kajdy, Anna
    Lewandowska, Roksana
    Kwiatkowska, Ewa
    Cymbaluk-Ploska, Aneta
    Rabijewski, Michal
    Torbe, Andrzej
    Kwiatkowski, Sebastian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (12)
  • [15] Impact of Prenatal Care Utilization on Infant Care Practices in Nepal: a National Representative Cross-sectional Survey
    Subas Neupane
    Bright I. Nwaru
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2014, 173 : 99 - 109
  • [16] Low birth weight and prenatal care in Colombia: a cross-sectional study
    Maria Pinzon-Rondon, Angela
    Gutierrez-Pinzon, Vivian
    Madrinan-Navia, Humberto
    Amin, Jennifer
    Aguilera-Otalvaro, Paula
    Hoyos-Martinez, Alfonso
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15
  • [17] Prenatal care and pregnancy outcomes: A cross-sectional study in Luanda, Angola
    Nimi, Tazi
    Fraga, Silvia
    Costa, Diogo
    Campos, Paulo
    Barros, Henrique
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2016, 135 : S72 - S78
  • [18] Radiation oncology outpatient perceptions of patient-centred care: a cross-sectional survey
    Mackenzie, Lisa J.
    Sanson-Fisher, Rob W.
    Carey, Mariko L.
    D'Este, Catherine A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (02):
  • [19] Women's perspectives on antenatal breast expression: a cross-sectional survey
    Fair, Frankie J.
    Watson, Helen
    Gardner, Rachel
    Soltani, Hora
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2018, 15
  • [20] Impact of Prenatal Care Utilization on Infant Care Practices in Nepal: a National Representative Cross-sectional Survey
    Neupane, Subas
    Nwaru, Bright I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2014, 173 (01) : 99 - 109