The Value of Rapid Antigen Tests for Identifying Carriers of Viable SARS-CoV-2

被引:8
作者
Shidlovskaya, Elena, V [1 ]
Kuznetsova, Nadezhda A. [1 ]
Divisenko, Elizaveta, V [1 ]
Nikiforova, Maria A. [1 ]
Siniavin, Andrei E. [1 ,2 ]
Ogarkova, Daria A. [1 ]
Shagaev, Aleksandr, V [3 ]
Semashko, Maria A. [1 ]
Tkachuk, Artem P. [1 ]
Burgasova, Olga A. [1 ,4 ]
Gushchin, Vladimir A. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Minist Hlth Russian Federat, Ivanovsky Inst Virol, NF Gamaleya Natl Res Ctr Epidemiol & Microbiol, Moscow 123098, Russia
[2] Russian Acad Sci, Shemyakin Ovchinnikov Inst Bioorgan Chem, Dept Mol Neuroimmune Signalling, Moscow 117997, Russia
[3] Moscow Healthcare Dept, Moscow 127006, Russia
[4] Peoples Friendship Univ Russia, RUDN Univ, Dept Infect Dis, Courses Epidemiol & Phthisiol, Moscow 117198, Russia
[5] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Dept Virol, Moscow 119991, Russia
来源
VIRUSES-BASEL | 2021年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; viable virus; rapid antigen tests;
D O I
10.3390/v13102012
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The search for effective methods to detect patients who excrete a viable virus is one of the urgent tasks of modern biomedicine. In the present study, we examined the diagnostic value of two antigen tests, BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag (RapiGEN Inc., Anyang, Korea) and SGTI-flex COVID-19 Ag (Sugentech Inc., Cheongju, Korea), for their diagnostic value in identifying patients who excrete viable SARS-CoV-2. As part of the study, we examined samples from 106 patients who had just been admitted to the hospital and who had undergone quantitative RT-PCR and assessment of viability of SARS-CoV-2 using cell culture. Assessment of the tests' value for detecting samples containing viable virus showed high sensitivity for both tests. Sensitivity was 78.6% (95% CI, from 49.2% to 95.3%) for SGTI-flex COVID-19 Ag and 100% (95% CI, from 76.8% to 100%) for Biocredit COVID-19 Ag. The specificity of rapid tests was significantly higher than that of RT-PCR and was 66.3% (95% CI, from 55.7% to 75.8%) and 67.4% (95% CI, from 56.8% to 76.8%) for SGTI-flex COVID-19 Ag and Biocredit COVID-19 Ag versus 30.4% (95% CI, from 21.3% to 40.9%) obtained for PCR. Thus, for tasks of identifying viable SARS-CoV-2 during screening of conditionally healthy people, as well as monitoring those quarantined, rapid tests show significantly better results.</p>
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Lessons from applied large-scale pooling of 133,816 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests [J].
Barak, Netta ;
Ben-Ami, Roni ;
Sido, Tal ;
Perri, Amir ;
Shtoyer, Aviad ;
Rivkin, Mila ;
Licht, Tamar ;
Peretz, Ayelet ;
Magenheim, Judith ;
Fogel, Irit ;
Livneh, Ayalah ;
Daitch, Yutti ;
Oiknine-Djian, Esther ;
Benedek, Gil ;
Dor, Yuval ;
Wolf, Dana G. ;
Yassour, Moran .
SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 13 (589)
[2]   Swab pooling: A new method for large-scale RT-qPCR screening of SARS-CoV-2 avoiding sample dilution [J].
Christoff, Ana Paula ;
Flores Cruz, Giuliano Netto ;
Rodrigues Sereia, Aline Fernanda ;
Boberg, Dellyana Rodrigues ;
de Bastiani, Daniela Carolina ;
Yamanaka, Lais Eiko ;
Fongaro, Gislaine ;
Stoco, Patricia Hermes ;
Bazzo, Maria Luiza ;
Grisard, Edmundo Carlos ;
Hernandes, Camila ;
Valter de Oliveira, Luiz Felipe .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02)
[3]   Analysis of multi-sample pools in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA for mass screening: An Indian perspective [J].
Deka, Sangeeta ;
Kalita, Deepjyoti ;
Mangla, Amit ;
Shankar, Ravi .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 38 (3-4) :451-456
[4]   Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Review) [J].
Dinnes, Jacqueline ;
Deeks, Jonathan J. ;
Adriano, Ada ;
Berhane, Sarah ;
Davenport, Clare ;
Dittrich, Sabine ;
Emperador, Devy ;
Takwoingi, Yemisi ;
Cunningham, Jane ;
Beese, Sophie ;
Dretzke, Janine ;
di Ruffano, Lavinia Ferrante ;
Harris, Isobel M. ;
Price, Malcolm J. ;
Taylor-Phillips, Sian ;
Hooft, Lotty ;
Leeflang, Mariska M. G. ;
Spijker, Rene ;
Van den Bruel, Ann .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (08)
[5]  
He Xi, 2020, Nature Medicine, V26, DOI [10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5, 10.1038/s41591-020-1016-z]
[6]  
Imam N., 2020, BREAKING COVID 19 LI, P25
[7]   In Vitro Rapid Antigen Test Performance with the SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), P.1 (Gamma), and B.1.617.2 (Delta) [J].
Jungnick, Sabrina ;
Hobmaier, Bernhard ;
Mautner, Lena ;
Hoyos, Mona ;
Haase, Maren ;
Baiker, Armin ;
Lahne, Heidi ;
Eberle, Ute ;
Wimmer, Clara ;
Hepner, Sabrina ;
Sprenger, Annika ;
Berger, Carola ;
Dangel, Alexandra ;
Ippisch, Siegfried ;
Hahner, Sonja ;
Wildner, Manfred ;
Liebl, Bernhard ;
Ackermann, Nikolaus ;
Sing, Andreas ;
Fingerle, Volker .
MICROORGANISMS, 2021, 9 (09)
[8]   Detection of the new SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 in five SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (RATs), Germany, March 2021 [J].
Jungnick, Sabrina ;
Hobmaier, Bernhard ;
Mautner, Lena ;
Hoyos, Mona ;
Haase, Maren ;
Baiker, Armin ;
Lahne, Heidi ;
Eberle, Ute ;
Wimmer, Clara ;
Hepner, Sabrina ;
Sprenger, Annika ;
Berger, Carola ;
Dangel, Alexandra ;
Wildner, Manfred ;
Liebl, Bernhard ;
Ackermann, Nikolaus ;
Sing, Andreas ;
Fingerle, Volker .
EUROSURVEILLANCE, 2021, 26 (16)
[9]   Variation in False-Negative Rate of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since Exposure [J].
Kucirka, Lauren M. ;
Lauer, Stephen A. ;
Laeyendecker, Oliver ;
Boon, Denali ;
Lessler, Justin .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 173 (04) :262-+
[10]  
Li RY, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P489, DOI [10.1126/science.abb3221, 10.1101/2020.02.14.20023127]