What and When Second-Language Learners Revise When Responding to Timed Writing Tasks on the Computer: The Roles of Task Type, Second Language Proficiency, and Keyboarding Skills

被引:62
作者
Barkaoui, Khaled [1 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, 253 Winters Coll,Keele Campus, Toronto, ON M3J 2R7, Canada
关键词
computer-based writing task; keyboarding skills; keystroke logging; revision behavior; second language proficiency; timed writing tasks; WORKING-MEMORY; TEXT REVISION; LANGUAGE; INPUTLOG; LEVEL; L1;
D O I
10.1111/modl.12316
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study contributes to the literature on second language (L2) learners' revision behavior by describing what, when, and how often L2 learners revise their texts when responding to timed writing tasks on the computer and by examining the effects of task type, L2 proficiency, and keyboarding skills on what and when L2 learners revise. Each of 54 participants with 2 levels of L2 proficiency (low vs. high) and 2 levels of keyboarding skills (low vs. high) responded to timed independent and integrated writing tasks on the computer. A keystroke logging program recorded each participant's writing activities. Keystroke data were coded in terms of participants' revision behavior (e.g., orientation, linguistic domain, and temporal location of revisions) and then compared across tasks and learner groups. The findings suggest that the participants tended to revise form more often than content and that L2 proficiency and, to a lesser extent, task type, but not keyboarding skills, affected participants' revision behaviors during the timed writing tasks. Overall, the participants made more precontextual (that is, at the point of inscription) revisions than contextual revisions (that is, revisions of already written text), made considerably more typography and language revisions than content revisions, revised more frequently at the phrase and word level than at higher levels, and tended to make precontextual revisions more frequently in the first two thirds of the writing process and contextual revisions most frequently in the last third of the writing session. The findings and their implications for practice and research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 340
页数:21
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Allal L., 2004, Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_1
  • [2] Alves RA, 2007, STUD WRIT, V20, P55
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1981, College Composition and Communication
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, MODELS WRITING, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-010-0804-4_1
  • [5] Barkaoui K., 2015, RR1504 ETS
  • [6] Revision in Second Language Writing: What Teachers Need to Know
    Barkaoui, Khaled
    [J]. TESL CANADA JOURNAL, 2007, 25 (01): : 81 - 92
  • [7] Bartelett J., 1982, What writers know. The language, P345
  • [8] BEASON L, 1993, RES TEACH ENGL, V27, P395
  • [9] Broekkamp H., 1996, Theories, models and methodology in writing research, P170
  • [10] Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence
    Butterfield, EC
    Hacker, DJ
    Albertson, LR
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1996, 8 (03) : 239 - 297