Extra-Pulmonary Vein Triggers at de novo and the Repeat Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation

被引:19
|
作者
Kim, Daehoon [1 ]
Hwang, Taehyun [1 ]
Kim, Min [1 ]
Yu, Hee Tae [1 ]
Kim, Tae-Hoon [1 ]
Uhm, Jae-Sun [1 ]
Joung, Boyoung [1 ]
Lee, Moon-Hyoung [1 ]
Pak, Hui-Nam [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2021年 / 8卷
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; recurrence; extra-pulmonary vein triggers; remodeling; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; PERSISTENT; MYOFIBROBLASTS; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2021.759967
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Extra-pulmonary vein triggers can play a significant role in atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation. We explored the characteristics of the extra-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers in de novo and repeat atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (AFCA).Methods: We included 2,118 patients who underwent a de novo AFCA (women 27.6%, 59.2 +/- 10.9 years old, paroxysmal AF 65.9%) and 227 of them conducted repeat procedures. All included patients underwent isoproterenol provocation tests at the end of the procedure, and then we analyzed extra-PV triggers-related factors.Results: Extra-PV triggers were documented in 11.7% of patients undergoing de novo AFCA (1.22 +/- 0.46 foci per patient) and 28.6% undergoing repeat AFCA (1.49 +/- 0.73 foci per patient). Older age and higher LA volume index in de novo procedures and women, diabetes, and higher parasympathetic nerve activity (heart rate variability) in repeat-AFCA were independently associated with the existence of extra-PV triggers. The septum (19.9%), coronary sinus (14.7%), and superior vena cava (11.2%) were common extra-PV foci. Among 46 patients who were newly found to have mappable extra-PV triggers upon repeat procedures, 15 (32.6%) matched with the previous focal or empirical extra-PV ablation sites. The rate of AF recurrence was significantly higher in patients with extra-PV triggers than in those without after de novo (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.54-2.38, p < 0.001) and repeat procedures (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.63-4.42, p < 0.001).Conclusions: Extra-PV triggers were commonly found in AF patients with significant remodeling and previous empirical extra-PV ablation. The existence of extra-PV triggers was independently associated with poorer rhythm outcomes after the de novo and repeat AFCA.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Strategies for repeat ablation for atrial fibrillation: A multicentre comparison of nonpulmonary vein versus pulmonary vein target ablation
    Mol, Daniel
    Mulder, Mark J.
    Veenstra, Rob
    Allaart, Cornelis P.
    Hof, Irene E.
    Kemme, Michiel J. B.
    Khan, Muchtiar
    Kimman, Geert-Jan P.
    Mairuhu, Gideon
    de Ruiter, Gijsbert S.
    Tahapary, Giovanni J. M.
    de Groot, Joris R.
    de Jong, Jonas S. S. G.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (05) : 885 - 896
  • [32] The impact of anatomical remodeling of the left atrium and pulmonary vein on the recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation
    Chen, Wei-Ta
    Chang, Shih-Lin
    Lin, Yenn-Jiang
    Lo, Li-Wei
    Hu, Yu-Feng
    Chao, Tze-Fan
    Chung, Fa-Po
    Liao, Jo-Nan
    Huang, Yen-Chang
    Hsieh, Ming-Hsiung
    Lina, Yung-Kuo
    Chen, Yi-Jen
    Chen, Shih-Ann
    Tsao, Hsuan-Ming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 176 (03) : 1170 - 1172
  • [33] Repeat catheter ablation after very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation
    Stauffer, Niklas
    Knecht, Sven
    Badertscher, Patrick
    Krisai, Philipp
    Hennings, Elisa
    Serban, Teodor
    Voellmin, Gian
    Osswald, Stefan
    Sticherling, Christian
    Kuhne, Michael
    EUROPACE, 2024, 26 (05):
  • [34] Acute pulmonary vein stenosis during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation
    Yakabe, Daisuke
    Araki, Masahiro
    Inoue, Shujiro
    Nakamura, Toshihiro
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2023, : 960 - 962
  • [35] Association between the locations of non-pulmonary vein triggers and ablation outcomes in repeat procedures after cryoballoon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
    Tomomasa Takamiya
    Osamu Inaba
    Junichi Nitta
    Akira Sato
    Yukihiro Inamura
    Kazuya Murata
    Takashi Ikenouchi
    Toshikazu Kono
    Giichi Nitta
    Yoshihide Takahashi
    Masahiko Goya
    Tetsuo Sasano
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2021, 62 : 381 - 389
  • [36] Association between the locations of non-pulmonary vein triggers and ablation outcomes in repeat procedures after cryoballoon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
    Takamiya, Tomomasa
    Inaba, Osamu
    Nitta, Junichi
    Sato, Akira
    Inamura, Yukihiro
    Murata, Kazuya
    Ikenouchi, Takashi
    Kono, Toshikazu
    Nitta, Giichi
    Takahashi, Yoshihide
    Goya, Masahiko
    Sasano, Tetsuo
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 62 (02) : 381 - 389
  • [37] The Anatomical Basis of Pulmonary Vein Reconnection After Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
    McGarry, Thomas J.
    Narayan, Sanjiv M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (10) : 939 - 941
  • [38] Long-term outcome of thoracoscopic ablation and radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation as a de novo procedure
    Kim, Juwon
    Kim, Ju Youn
    Jeong, Dong Seop
    Chung, Tae-Wan
    Park, Seung-Jung
    Park, Kyoung-Min
    Kim, June Soo
    Lee, Joo Myung
    On, Young Keun
    EUROPACE, 2023, 25 (05):
  • [39] Association of Electrophysiologic Characteristics of Extra Pulmonary Vein Triggers With Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence
    Lee, Young Shin
    Kim, Daehoon
    Pak, Hui-Nam
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [40] Repeat pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: low ablation index is associated with increased risk of recurrent arrhythmia
    Kristiansen, Steen B.
    Shafaq, Ajmal
    Tofig, Bawer J.
    Gerdes, Christian
    Jensen, Henrik K.
    Kristensen, Jens
    Parner, Erik T.
    Lukac, Peter
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2021, 55 (01) : 29 - 34