Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept Treat-and-Extend for Macular Edema in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: the CENTERA Study

被引:20
|
作者
Korobelnik, Jean-Francois
Larsen, Michael
Eter, Nicole
Bailey, Clare
Wolf, Sebastian
Schmelter, Thomas
Allmeier, Helmut
Chaudhary, Varun
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ CHU, Serv Ophtalmol, Bordeaux, France
[2] Univ Bordeaux, Inst Natl Sante & Rech Med INSERM, Unite Mixte Rech UMR, Bordeaux Populat Hlth Res Ctr,Team Lifelong Expos, Bordeaux, France
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Ophthalmol, Rigshosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Munster, Dept Ophthalmol, Med Ctr, Munster, Germany
[5] Bristol Eye Hosp, Bristol, Avon, England
[6] Univ Bern, Dept Ophthalmol, Inselspital, Univ Hosp, Bern, Switzerland
[7] Bayer AG, Dept Ophthalmol, Berlin, Germany
[8] Bayer Consumer Care HA AG, Basel, Switzerland
[9] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton Reg Eye Inst, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[10] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; TRAP-EYE; SECONDARY; INJECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2021.01.027
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
center dot PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treat-and-extend dosing in patients with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). center dot DESIGN: CENTERA (Evaluation of a Treat and Extend Regimen of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Macular Edema Secondary to CRVO; NCT02800642) was an open-label, Phase 4 clinical study. center dot METHODS: Patients received 2 mg of IVT-AFL at baseline and every 4 weeks thereafter, until disease stability criteria were met (or until week 20), at which point treatment intervals were adjusted in 2-week increments based on functional and anatomic outcomes. center dot RESULTS: From baseline to week 76, 105 patients (65.6%) ( P < .0001 [test against threshold of 40%]) gained >15 letters; and, during the treat-and-extend phase, 72 patients (45.0%) ( P = 0.8822 [test against threshold of 50%]) achieved a mean treatment interval of >8 weeks. A last and next planned treatment interval of >8 weeks was achieved by 101 patients (63.1%) and by 108 patients (67.5%), respectively. Mean +/- SD best-corrected visual acuity increased from 51.9 +/- 16.8 letters at baseline to 72.3 +/- 18.5 letters at week 76 (mean change: + 20.3 +/- 19.5 letters), and central retinal thickness decreased from 759.9 +/- 246.0 & micro;m at baseline to 265.4 +/- 57.9 & micro;m at week 76 (mean change: & minus;496.1 +/- 252.4 & micro;m). The safety profile of IVT-AFL was consistent with that of previous studies. center dot CONCLUSIONS: Clinically meaningful improvements in functional and anatomic outcomes were achieved with IVT-AFL treat-and-extend dosing. Most patients achieved a last actual and last intended treatment interval of >8 weeks; therefore, treatment intervals may have been extended even further with a longer study duration. (Am J Ophthalmol 2021;227: 106-115. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/ ))
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 115
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Short-term efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion that is refractory to intravitreal bevacizumab
    Yoo, Seul Gi
    Kim, Jae Hui
    Lee, Tae Gon
    Kim, Chul Gu
    Kim, Jong Woo
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 63 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [42] Role of intravitreal bevacizumab for resistant macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion after failure of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide
    Le Moigne, O.
    Duncombe, A.
    Portmann, A.
    Muraine, M.
    Genevois, O.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2012, 35 (09): : 700 - 704
  • [43] PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF INTRAVITREAL TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE VERSUS BEVACIZUMAB FOR MACULAR EDEMA SECONDARY TO CENTRAL RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION
    Ding, Xiaoyan
    Li, Jiaqing
    Hu, Xuting
    Yu, Shanshan
    Pan, Jianying
    Tang, Shibo
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2011, 31 (05): : 838 - 845
  • [44] Aflibercept treatment for macular edema with and without serous retinal detachment due to branch retinal vein occlusion
    Irgat, Saadet Gultekin
    Ozcura, Fatih
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2023, 86 (01) : 60 - 67
  • [45] Real-Life Evidence for Using a Treat-and-Extend Injection Regime for Patients with Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
    Eleftheriadou, Maria
    Nicholson, Luke
    D'Alonzo, Giulia
    Addison, Peter K. F.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2019, 8 (02) : 289 - 296
  • [46] Retinal Function and Morphology in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion With Macular Edema
    Noma, Hidetaka
    Mimura, Tatsuya
    Shimada, Katsunori
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2013, 38 (01) : 143 - 149
  • [47] The Efficiency of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implants in the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
    Unsal, Erkan
    Eltutar, Kadir
    Sultan, Pinar
    Gungel, Hulya
    JOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 31 (06) : 350 - 356
  • [48] Recurrence of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion after intravitreal bevacizumab
    Hanada, Narihisa
    Iijima, Hiroyuki
    Sakurada, Yoichi
    Imasawa, Mitsuhiro
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 56 (02) : 165 - 174
  • [49] Predictive factors for changes in macular edema in intravitreal bevacizumab therapy of retinal vein occlusion
    Ach, Thomas
    Hoeh, Alexandra E.
    Schaal, Karen B.
    Scheuerle, Alexander F.
    Dithmar, Stefan
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 248 (02) : 155 - 159
  • [50] Extended Injection Intervals after Switching from Ranibizumab to Aflibercept in Macular Edema due to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
    Nghiem-Buffet, Sylvia
    Glacet-Bernard, Agnes
    Addou-Regnard, Manar
    Souied, Eric H.
    Cohen, Salomon Y.
    Giocanti-Auregan, Audrey
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 2018