Are Individual Differences in Reading Speed Related to Extrafoveal Visual Acuity and Crowding?

被引:17
作者
Froemer, Romy [1 ]
Dimigen, Olaf [1 ,2 ]
Niefind, Florian [1 ]
Krause, Niels [1 ]
Kliegl, Reinhold [2 ]
Sommer, Werner [1 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
EYE-MOVEMENT CONTROL; PERCEPTUAL SPAN; PREVIEW BENEFIT; SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY; RECOGNITION; FIXATION; READERS; RESOLUTION; ENGLISH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0121986
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Readers differ considerably in their speed of self-paced reading. One factor known to influence fixation durations in reading is the preprocessing of words in parafoveal vision. Here we investigated whether individual differences in reading speed or the amount of information extracted from upcoming words (the preview benefit) can be explained by basic differences in extrafoveal vision-i.e., the ability to recognize peripheral letters with or without the presence of flanking letters. Forty participants were given an adaptive test to determine their eccentricity thresholds for the identification of letters presented either in isolation (extrafoveal acuity) or flanked by other letters (crowded letter recognition). In a separate eye-tracking experiment, the same participants read lists of words from left to right, while the preview of the upcoming words was manipulated with the gaze-contingent moving window technique. Relationships between dependent measures were analyzed on the observational level and with linear mixed models. We obtained highly reliable estimates both for extrafoveal letter identification (acuity and crowding) and measures of reading speed (overall reading speed, size of preview benefit). Reading speed was higher in participants with larger uncrowded windows. However, the strength of this relationship was moderate and it was only observed if other sources of variance in reading speed (e.g., the occurrence of regressive saccades) were eliminated. Moreover, the size of the preview benefit-an important factor in normal reading-was larger in participants with better extrafoveal acuity. Together, these results indicate a significant albeit moderate contribution of extrafoveal vision to individual differences in reading speed.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] STATISTICS NOTES - ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE
    ALTMAN, DG
    BLAND, JM
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7003) : 485 - 485
  • [2] Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environments
    Andrews, TJ
    Coppola, DM
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 1999, 39 (17) : 2947 - 2953
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, DATA ANAL USING REGR, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511790942
  • [4] [Anonymous], JOURNAL OF EYE MOVEM
  • [5] [Anonymous], SHRINKAGE APPL TUTOR
  • [6] Eye movements and the perceptual span in silent and oral reading
    Ashby, Jane
    Yang, Jinmian
    Evans, Kris H. C.
    Rayner, Keith
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2012, 74 (04) : 634 - 640
  • [7] The Freiburg Visual Acuity test - Automatic measurement of visual acuity
    Bach, M
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1996, 73 (01) : 49 - 53
  • [8] Bates D., 2014, Journal of Statistical Software
  • [9] Bates D, 2019, lme4: Linear mixed -effects models using 'Eigen' and S4, DOI DOI 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  • [10] On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension: an individual differences approach
    Bornkessel, ID
    Fiebach, CJ
    Friederici, AD
    [J]. COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 21 (01): : 11 - 21