A Scenario-Based Analysis of Forest Product Transportation Using a Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method

被引:4
|
作者
Akay, Anil Orhan [1 ]
Demir, Murat [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Fac Forestry, Dept Forest Construct & Transportat, TR-34473 Istanbul, Turkey
来源
FORESTS | 2022年 / 13卷 / 05期
关键词
long distance transport; traffic infrastructure network; timber harvesting; CO2; emission; TOPSIS; AHP; EXTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; TIMBER TRUCKING; FUEL CONSUMPTION; TIME CONSUMPTION; MOISTURE-CONTENT; BIOMASS; ENERGY; EFFICIENCY; PERFORMANCE; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.3390/f13050730
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to reveal the weight values of the criteria that are effective in selecting the most suitable vehicle types in forest products transportation by using hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method. According to different scenarios, the goal is to determine which vehicle alternative is the most suitable in given conditions. In the results obtained from the study, it is determined that the most important main criterion in determining the eligibility of vehicle alternatives in forest products transport is the environmental damage criterion, while the other main criteria are cost and operational performance, in order of importance. In the scope of the study, transportation scenarios including different operational conditions were created and the suitability of vehicle alternatives was evaluated according to the scenarios, taking into account CO2 emission and road surface damage risk criteria. Transportation of coniferous and broadleaved tree species makes a difference in vehicle suitability rankings according to transportation scenarios. In addition, it was observed that the variability in the amount of roundwoods to be transported affects the vehicle suitability rankings. It will be beneficial to consider the total weight of the forest product to be transported and the tree species in the selection vehicle type.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An α-cut intervals based Fuzzy Best-Worst Method for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Ratandhara, Harshit M.
    Kumar, Mohit
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2024, 159
  • [22] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Using Connection Number Based TOPSIS Method Under Tripolar Fuzzy Environment
    Arif, Waqar
    Khan, Waheed Ahmad
    Khan, Asghar
    Le, Ha Viet
    Tran, Nhung Thi
    Pham, Hai Van
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 142127 - 142140
  • [23] Intellectual Capital Evaluation Index Based on a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Technique
    Liu, Chao
    Liao, Qichen
    Gao, Wenyan
    Li, Shuxian
    Jiang, Peng
    Li, Ding
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (09)
  • [24] A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for firms competence evaluation
    Amiri, M.
    Zandieh, M.
    Soltani, R.
    Vahdani, B.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (10) : 12314 - 12322
  • [25] Developing the Expert Decision-Making Algorithm Using the Methods of Multi-Criteria Analysis
    Basheleishvili, Irakli
    CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 20 (02) : 22 - 29
  • [26] A hybrid data analytic methodology for 3PL transportation provider evaluation using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making
    Yayla, Adile Yesim
    Oztekin, Asil
    Gumus, Alev Taskin
    Gunasekaran, Angappa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2015, 53 (20) : 6097 - 6113
  • [27] Smart City Wildfire Risk Analysis with Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Rani, Rekha
    Potika, Katerina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEMANTIC COMPUTING, 2024, 18 (03) : 347 - 381
  • [28] Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based on positive and negative extreme solutions
    Wang, Yu-Jie
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (04) : 1994 - 2004
  • [29] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model based on lower and upper boundaries
    Wang, Yu-Jie
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (07) : 3213 - 3224
  • [30] Hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision making based multi cluster head dolphin swarm optimized IDS for VANET
    Sharma, Sparsh
    Kaul, Ajay
    VEHICULAR COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 12 : 23 - 38