The MIMIC Code Repository: enabling reproducibility in critical care research

被引:240
|
作者
Johnson, Alistair E. W. [1 ]
Stone, David J. [2 ]
Celi, Leo A. [1 ,3 ]
Pollard, Tom J. [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, E25-505,77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
critical care; reproducibility; mimic-iii; data mining; intensive care; electronic health record; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS; ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY; UNITED-STATES; SEPSIS; SYSTEM; SCORE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MORTALITY; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocx084
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Lack of reproducibility in medical studies is a barrier to the generation of a robust knowledge base to support clinical decision-making. In this paper we outline the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) Code Repository, a centralized code base for generating reproducible studies on an openly available critical care dataset. Code is provided to load the data into a relational structure, create extractions of the data, and reproduce entire analysis plans including research studies. Concepts extracted include severity of illness scores, comorbid status, administrative definitions of sepsis, physiologic criteria for sepsis, organ failure scores, treatment administration, and more. Executable documents are used for tutorials and reproduce published studies end-to-end, providing a template for future researchers to replicate. The repository's issue tracker enables community discussion about the data and concepts, allowing users to collaboratively improve the resource. The centralized repository provides a platform for users of the data to interact directly with the data generators, facilitating greater understanding of the data. It also provides a location for the community to collaborate on necessary concepts for research progress and share them with a larger audience. Consistent application of the same code for underlying concepts is a key step in ensuring that research studies on the MIMIC database are comparable and reproducible. By providing open source code alongside the freely accessible MIMIC-III database, we enable end-to-end reproducible analysis of electronic health records.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 39
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enabling a Pervasive Approach for Intelligent Decision Support in Critical Health Care
    Portela, Carlos Filipe
    Santos, Manuel Filipe
    Silva, Alvaro
    Machado, Jose
    Abelha, Antonio
    ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PT 3, 2011, 221 : 233 - +
  • [32] The National Institute for Health Research Critical Care Research Priority Setting Survey 2018
    Tatham, Kate C.
    McAuley, Daniel F.
    Borthwick, Mark
    Henderson, Neil G.
    Bashevoy, Gemma
    Brett, Stephen J.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTENSIVE CARE SOCIETY, 2020, 21 (03) : 198 - 201
  • [33] Descriptors of Sepsis Using the Sepsis-3 Criteria: A Cohort Study in Critical Care Units Within the UK National Institute for Health Research Critical Care Health Informatics Collaborative*
    Shah, Anoop D.
    MacCallum, Niall S.
    Harris, Steve
    Brealey, David A.
    Palmer, Edward
    Hetherington, James
    Shi, Sinan
    Perez-Suarez, David
    Ercole, Ari
    Watkinson, Peter J.
    Jones, Andrew
    Ashworth, Simon
    Beale, Richard
    Brett, Stephen J.
    Singer, Mervyn
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (11) : 1883 - 1894
  • [34] open access MIMIC-II database for intensive care research
    Lee, Joon
    Scott, Daniel J.
    Villarroel, Mauricio
    Clifford, Gari D.
    Saeed, Mohammed
    Mark, Roger G.
    2011 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2011, : 8315 - 8318
  • [35] Multisociety Task Force for Critical Care Research Key Issues and Recommendations
    Deutschman, Clifford S.
    Ahrens, Thin
    Cairns, Charles B.
    Sessler, Curtis N.
    Parsons, Polly E.
    CHEST, 2012, 141 (01) : 201 - 209
  • [36] Multisociety Task Force for Critical Care Research: Key Issues and Recommendations
    Deutschman, Clifford S.
    Ahrens, Tom
    Cairns, Charles B.
    Sessler, Curtis N.
    Parsons, Polly E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 185 (01) : 96 - 102
  • [37] The methodological quality of animal research in critical care: the public face of science
    Meredith Bara
    Ari R Joffe
    Annals of Intensive Care, 4
  • [38] Contemporary strategies to improve clinical trial design for critical care research: insights from the First Critical Care Clinical Trialists Workshop
    Michael O. Harhay
    Jonathan D. Casey
    Marina Clement
    Sean P. Collins
    Étienne Gayat
    Michelle Ng Gong
    Samir Jaber
    Pierre-François Laterre
    John C. Marshall
    Michael A. Matthay
    Rhonda E. Monroe
    Todd W. Rice
    Eileen Rubin
    Wesley H. Self
    Alexandre Mebazaa
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2020, 46 : 930 - 942
  • [39] Critical care pharmacy practice advancement recommendations on direct patient care activities: An opinion of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Critical Care Practice and Research Network
    Buckley, Mitchell S.
    Acquisto, Nicole M.
    Adams, Christopher
    Brandt, Kimberly
    Ammar, Mahmoud A.
    Deshpande, Ranjit
    Bullard, Heather
    Santibanez, Melissa
    Fontaine, Gabriel V.
    Musselman, Megan
    Noble, Melissa
    Van Cleve, Jonathan
    Whitcomb, John J.
    Johansson, Marcia
    Jontz, Ashlee
    Bates, Kimberly
    O'Connor, Michael F.
    Mayer, Daniel
    Lanspa, Michael
    Uppalapu, Suresh
    Tompeck, Alison J.
    Rodricks, Michael
    Choron, Rachel L.
    Walls, David O.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2023, 6 (08): : 925 - 933
  • [40] MULTISOCIETY TASK FORCE FOR CRITICAL CARE RESEARCH: KEY ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
    Deutschman, Clifford S.
    Ahrens, Tom
    Cairns, Charles B.
    Sessler, Curtis N.
    Parsons, Polly E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 21 (01) : 15 - 23