Long-term efficacy and tolerability of intranasal fentanyl in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain

被引:24
作者
Mercadante, Sebastiano [1 ]
Vellucci, Renato [2 ]
Cuomo, Arturo [3 ]
Adile, Claudio [1 ]
Cortegiani, Andrea [4 ]
Valle, Alessandro [5 ]
Villari, Patrizia [1 ]
Casuccio, Alessandra [6 ]
机构
[1] La Maddalena Canc Ctr, Pain Relief & Palliat Care Unit, I-90146 Palermo, Italy
[2] Osped, Pain Unit, Florence, Italy
[3] Natl Canc Inst Pascale, Pain Unit, Anesthesia & Intens Care, Naples, Italy
[4] Univ Palermo, Policlin P Giaccone, Sect Anesthesia Analgesia Intens Care & Emergency, Dept Biopathol Med & Forens Biotechnol DIBIMEF, Palermo, Italy
[5] FARO Fdn, Turin, Italy
[6] Univ Palermo, Dept Sci Hlth Promot & Mother Child Care G DAless, Palermo, Italy
关键词
Cancer pain; Breakthrough pain; Intranasal fentanyl; Tolerability; PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; PECTIN NASAL SPRAY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; OPIOID-TOLERANT PATIENTS; OPEN-LABEL; DOUBLE-BLIND; INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE; HEALTHY-SUBJECTS; CROSSOVER TRIAL; BUCCAL TABLET;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-014-2491-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to assess the long-term tolerability and efficacy of intranasal fentanyl (INFS) in opioid-tolerant patients with breakthrough cancer pain (BTP). A 6 months, observational, prospective, cohort study design was employed to follow advanced cancer patients with BTP receiving INFS under routine clinical practice. Eligible adult cancer patients suffering from BTP had been prescribed INFS at effective doses. Data were collected at T0 and at month intervals for six months. The principal outcomes were the evaluation of possible serious adverse effects with prolonged use of INFS, the efficacy of BTP treatment with INFS, the quality of sleep, the rate of INFS discontinuation, and reasons for that. Seventy-five patients were surveyed. Thirty-four patients (45.3 %) had a follow-up at 3 months, and twelve patients (16 %) were followed up at 6 months. The mean opioid doses, expressed as oral morphine equivalents, ranged 111-180 mg/day, while the mean INFS doses were 87-119 mu g. Adverse effects were reported in a minority of patients and were considered to be associated with opioid therapy used for background pain. The quality of sleep significantly improved during the first 3-4 months. Finally, efficacy based on a general impression regarding the efficacy of INFS was good-excellent in most patients and statistically improved in time up to the third month. The long-term use of INFS in advanced cancer patients is effective and safe. No serious adverse effects were found up to six months of assessment. The level of quality of sleep and patients' satisfaction was relatively good, considering the advanced stage of disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1349 / 1354
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in the emergency department treatment of severe painful sickle cell crises in children: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial [J].
Barrett, Michael Joseph ;
Cronin, John ;
Murphy, Adrian ;
McCoy, Siobhan ;
Hayden, John ;
Fhaili, SineadNic An ;
Grant, Tim ;
Wakai, Abel ;
McMahon, Corrina ;
Walsh, Sean ;
O'Sullivan, Ronan .
TRIALS, 2012, 13
[2]   Equivalency of two concentrations of fentanyl administered by the intranasal route for acute analgesia in children in a paediatric emergency department: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Borland, Meredith ;
Milsom, Samantha ;
Esson, Amanda .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2011, 23 (02) :202-208
[3]   Comparative review of the clinical use of intranasal fentanyl versus morphine in a paediatric emergency department [J].
Borland, Meredith Louise ;
Clark, Lisa-Jayne ;
Esson, Amanda .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2008, 20 (06) :515-520
[4]   Intranasal fentanyl versus placebo for pain in children during catheterization for voiding cystourethrography [J].
Chung, Seen ;
Lim, Ruth ;
Goldman, Ran D. .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2010, 40 (07) :1236-1240
[5]   Intranasal Fentanyl Spray: A Novel Dosage Form for the Treatment of Breakthrough Cancer Pain [J].
Dietrich, Eric ;
Gums, John G. .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2012, 46 (10) :1382-1391
[6]   Intranasal fentanyl for analgesia in the paediatric emergency department [J].
Finn, Maria ;
Harris, Dan .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2010, 27 (04) :300-301
[7]   Intranasal drug delivery: An efficient and non-invasive route for systemic administration Focus on opioids [J].
Grassin-Delyle, Stanislas ;
Buenestado, Amparo ;
Naline, Emmanuel ;
Faisy, Christophe ;
Blouquit-Laye, Sabine ;
Couderc, Louis-Jean ;
Le Guen, Morgan ;
Fischler, Marc ;
Devillier, Philippe .
PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 134 (03) :366-379
[8]   Intranasal fentanyl in the treatment of acute pain - a systematic review [J].
Hansen, M. S. ;
Mathiesen, O. ;
Trautner, S. ;
Dahl, J. B. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 56 (04) :407-419
[9]   Intranasal Fentanyl in the Palliative Care of Newborns and Infants [J].
Harlos, Michael S. ;
Stenekes, Simone ;
Lambert, David ;
Hohl, Chris ;
Chochinov, Harvey Max .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2013, 46 (02) :265-274
[10]   INTRANASAL FENTANYL OR DIAMORPHINE VERSUS INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE FOR ANALGESIA IN ADULTS [J].
Helliwell, L. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2010, 27 (09) :715-716