User perspective on receiving adaptive equipment after stroke: A mixed-methods study

被引:5
作者
Boland, Pauline [1 ,2 ]
Levack, William M. M. [3 ]
Graham, Fiona P. [3 ]
Perry, Meredith A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Limerick, Sch Allied Hlth, Limerick, Ireland
[2] Univ Limerick, Hlth Res Inst, Limerick, Ireland
[3] Univ Otago, Rehabil Teaching & Res Unit, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Wellington, New Zealand
[4] Univ Otago, Ctr Hlth Act & Rehabil Res, Sch Physiotherapy, Wellington, New Zealand
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY-REVUE CANADIENNE D ERGOTHERAPIE | 2018年 / 85卷 / 04期
关键词
Activities of daily living; Community health services; Client-professional relationship; Decision making; Occupational therapy; MOBILITY AIDS; DEVICES; REHABILITATION; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1177/0008417418800834
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background. Adaptive equipment (AE) is frequently provided during stroke rehabilitation by occupational therapists. Purpose. This study aimed to identify the AE that people typically use after a stroke and the outcomes achieved as a result, and to explore people's experiences obtaining and using AE, to inform both practice and policy in this field. Method. A mixed-methods study, involving a postal questionnaire and interviews, used descriptive statistics and grounded theory to analyze the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Findings. Questionnaire data (n = 258) revealed mobility AE was issued most frequently, with increased safety as the primary reported outcome. Interview data (n = 15) indicated relationships with health professionals and the hospital environment shaped early AE selection and use. Once home, making sense of AE and community participation were more influential. Implications. Therapeutic relationships and reflection time are critical to maximize AE use after stroke. Policy and related funding for AE need to prioritize community participation.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 306
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, BEST PRACTICES MIXED
[2]  
[Anonymous], AG HLTH TECHN REP GL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, NVIVO QUALITATIVE DA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CONV RIGHTS PERS DIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, STROK REH LONG TERM
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, NZ CLIN GUID STROK M
[7]  
Anttila H., 2012, Technology and Disability, V24, P9, DOI DOI 10.3233/TAD-2012-0332
[8]  
Atwal A., 2005, Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, V52, P10
[9]   Assistive devices for balance and mobility: Benefits, demands, and adverse consequences [J].
Bateni, H ;
Maki, BE .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (01) :134-145
[10]   Equipment provision after stroke: A scoping review of the use of personal care and mobility aids in rehabilitation [J].
Boland, Pauline ;
Levack, William ;
Perry, Meredith ;
Graham, Fiona .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2017, 80 (02) :73-88