Measurement of the Hydrodynamic Radius of Quantum Dots by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy Excluding Blinking

被引:13
作者
de Thomaz, A. A. [1 ]
Almeida, D. B. [1 ]
Pelegati, V. B. [1 ]
Carvalho, H. F. [2 ,3 ]
Cesar, C. L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] State Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Inst Phys Gleb Wataghin, Dept Quantum Elect, BR-13083859 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] State Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Inst Biol, Dept Struct & Funct Biol, BR-13083865 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Natl Inst Photon Appl Cell Biol INFABIC, BR-13083865 Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
NANOCRYSTALS; DIFFUSION; WATER;
D O I
10.1021/jp512214p
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
One of the most important properties of quantum dots (QDs) is their size. Their size will determine optical properties and in a colloidal medium their range of interaction. The most common techniques used to measure QD size are transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray diffraction. However, these techniques demand the sample to be dried and under a vacuum. This way any hydrodynamic information is excluded and the preparation process may alter even the size of the QDs. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) is an optical technique with single molecule sensitivity capable of extracting the hydrodynamic radius (HR) of the QDs. The main drawback of FCS is the blinking phenomenon that alters the correlation function implicating in a QD apparent size smaller than it really is. In this work, we developed a method to exclude blinking of the FCS and measured the HR of colloidal QDs. We compared our results with TEM images, and the HR obtained by FCS is higher than the radius measured by TEM. We attribute this difference to the cap layer of the QD that cannot be seen in the TEM images.
引用
收藏
页码:4294 / 4299
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   How the Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope entered Biological Research [J].
Amos, WB ;
White, JG .
BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2003, 95 (06) :335-342
[2]   Semiconductor Quantum Dot Lasers: A Tutorial [J].
Coleman, James J. ;
Young, Jonathan D. ;
Garg, Akash .
JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 29 (04) :499-510
[3]   Diffusion coefficient measurements in microfluidic devices [J].
Culbertson, CT ;
Jacobson, SC ;
Ramsey, JM .
TALANTA, 2002, 56 (02) :365-373
[4]   Comparison of photophysical and colloidal properties of biocompatible semiconductor nanocrystals using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy [J].
Doose, S ;
Tsay, JM ;
Pinaud, F ;
Weiss, S .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 77 (07) :2235-2242
[5]   Focal volume optics and experimental artifacts in confocal fluorescence correlation spectroscopy [J].
Hess, ST ;
Webb, WW .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 83 (04) :2300-2317
[6]   Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy using quantum dots: advances, challenges and opportunities [J].
Heuff, Romey F. ;
Swift, Jody L. ;
Cramb, David T. .
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 9 (16) :1870-1880
[7]  
Ip AH, 2012, NAT NANOTECHNOL, V7, P577, DOI [10.1038/nnano.2012.127, 10.1038/NNANO.2012.127]
[8]   Solution-Processed Quantum Dot Photodetectors [J].
Konstantatos, Gerasimos ;
Sargent, Edward H. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2009, 97 (10) :1666-1683
[9]   VISCOSITY OF WATER AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURES [J].
KORSON, L ;
DROSTHAN.W ;
MILLERO, FJ .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1969, 73 (01) :34-&
[10]   Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: the technique and its applications [J].
Krichevsky, O ;
Bonnet, G .
REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS, 2002, 65 (02) :251-297