Sutured Repair of Primary Small Umbilical and Epigastric Hernias: Concomitant Rectus Diastasis Is a Significant Risk Factor for Recurrence

被引:110
作者
Koehler, Gernot [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luketina, Ruzica-Rosalia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Emmanuel, Klaus [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sisters Charity Hosp, Dept Gen & Visceral Surg, A-4010 Linz, Austria
[2] Graz Univ, Acad Teaching Hosp, Graz, Austria
[3] Univ Innsbruck, Acad Teaching Hosp, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
MESH; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-014-2765-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Umbilical and epigastric hernias are common in the adult population and prompt repair is advised. We aimed to evaluate the impact of concomitant rectus diastasis on the outcome of patients who underwent primary sutured fascia closure of a hernia without mesh. We performed a retrospective analysis of 231 consecutive adult patients who had undergone elective suture-based repair of small (< 2 cm) and primary umbilical or epigastric hernias with respect to complications, recurrence, and chronic pain. Patients with rectus diastasis suffered from a significantly increased rate of hernia recurrence (29/93 vs. 9/108; p < 0.001). The use of absorbable sutures also had a negative influence on the recurrence rate (26/90 vs. 12/111; p = 0.001). Obesity (body mass index > 35 kg/m(2)) was associated with more complications (p = 0.02). Wound infections following hernia repair also were associated with a higher rate of recurrence (p = 0.08) and chronic pain (p = 0.02). The mean follow-up via a structured questionnaire was 31 months (range 3-59) and data were available for 201 of 231 patients (87 %). We strongly recommend preoperatively checking for rectus diastasis and using nonabsorbable sutures as an alternative to mesh repair only when repairing small umbilical or epigastric hernias (< 2 cm) and there is no concomitant rectus diastasis. Patients with coexistent rectus diastasis definitely benefit from mesh-based repair of the midline to decrease the recurrence rate.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 126
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults [J].
Arroyo, A ;
García, P ;
Pérez, F ;
Andreu, J ;
Candela, F ;
Calpena, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (10) :1321-1323
[2]   Lower Reoperation Rate for Recurrence after Mesh versus Sutured Elective Repair in Small Umbilical and Epigastric Hernias. A Nationwide Register Study [J].
Christoffersen, M. W. ;
Helgstrand, F. ;
Rosenberg, J. ;
Kehlet, H. ;
Bisgaard, T. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 37 (11) :2548-2552
[3]   Long-term follow-up after elective adult umbilical hernia repair: low recurrence rates also after non-mesh repairs [J].
Dalenback, J. ;
Andersson, C. ;
Ribokas, D. ;
Rimback, G. .
HERNIA, 2013, 17 (04) :493-497
[4]   Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of total and types I and III collagens in patients with ventral hernias [J].
Fachinelli, Aldo ;
Trindade, Manoel Roberto Maciel .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2007, 392 (04) :459-464
[5]   A systematic review on the outcomes of correction of diastasis of the recti [J].
Hickey, F. ;
Finch, J. G. ;
Khanna, A. .
HERNIA, 2011, 15 (06) :607-614
[6]  
HJALTASON E, 1981, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V147, P263
[7]  
JACKSON OJ, 1970, CALIF MED, V113, P8
[8]   Incisional hernia recurrence following ''vest-over-pants'' or vertical mayo repair of primary hernias of the midline [J].
Luijendijk, RW ;
Lemmen, MHM ;
Hop, WCJ ;
Wereldsma, JCJ .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 21 (01) :62-66
[9]   Complications of mesh devices for intraperitoneal umbilical hernia repair: a word of caution [J].
Muysoms, F. E. ;
Bontinck, J. ;
Pletinckx, P. .
HERNIA, 2011, 15 (04) :463-468
[10]   Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias [J].
Muysoms, F. E. ;
Miserez, M. ;
Berrevoet, F. ;
Campanelli, G. ;
Champault, G. G. ;
Chelala, E. ;
Dietz, U. A. ;
Eker, H. H. ;
El Nakadi, I. ;
Hauters, P. ;
Hidalgo Pascual, M. ;
Hoeferlin, A. ;
Klinge, U. ;
Montgomery, A. ;
Simmermacher, R. K. J. ;
Simons, M. P. ;
Smietanski, M. ;
Sommeling, C. ;
Tollens, T. ;
Vierendeels, T. ;
Kingsnorth, A. .
HERNIA, 2009, 13 (04) :407-414