The Effect of Dutasteride on the Usefulness of Prostate Specific Antigen for the Diagnosis of High Grade and Clinically Relevant Prostate Cancer in Men With a Previous Negative Biopsy: Results From the REDUCE Study

被引:62
作者
Andriole, Gerald L. [1 ]
Bostwick, David [2 ]
Brawley, Otis W. [3 ,4 ]
Gomella, Leonard [5 ]
Marberger, Michael [6 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [7 ]
Pettaway, Curtis [8 ]
Tammela, Teuvo L. J. [9 ]
Teloken, Claudio [10 ,11 ]
Tindall, Donald [12 ]
Freedland, Stephen J. [13 ]
Somerville, Matthew C. [14 ]
Wilson, Timothy H. [14 ]
Fowler, Ivy [14 ]
Castro, Ramiro [14 ]
Rittmaster, Roger S. [14 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med St Louis, Div Urol Surg, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Bostwick Labs, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Amer Canc Soc, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[5] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Urol, Kimmel Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[6] Med Univ Vienna, Vienna, Austria
[7] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
[8] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[9] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Tampere, Finland
[10] UFCSPA Fed Univ Hlth Sci, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[11] Santa Casa Hosp, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[12] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[13] Duke Univ, Durham VA Med & Duke Prostate Ctr, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[14] GlaxoSmithKline, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; dutasteride; prostate-specific antigen; sensitivity and specificity; FINASTERIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We assessed whether dutasteride enhances the usefulness of total prostate specific antigen for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: The 4-year REDUCE study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg dutasteride daily for prostate cancer risk reduction in men with a prostate specific antigen of 2.5 to 10.0 ng/ml and a negative prostate biopsy. Specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values of prostate specific antigen for the diagnosis of prostate cancer were assessed. Results: Final prostate specific antigen before biopsy and change from month 6 to final prostate specific antigen performed better for the diagnosis of Gleason score 7-10 tumors in men who received dutasteride vs placebo as assessed by the area under the ROC curves (0.700 vs 0.650, p = 0.0491; and 0.699 vs 0.593, p = 0.0001, respectively). Increases in prostate specific antigen were associated with a higher likelihood of biopsy detectable, Gleason score 7-10 and clinically significant (modified Epstein criteria) prostate cancer. Percentage decreases in prostate specific antigen from baseline to month 6 in the dutasteride arm did not predict prostate cancer overall or Gleason score 7-10 cancer. Conclusions: In men with a previously negative prostate biopsy, prostate specific antigen performed better during the 4-year study as a marker of prostate cancer in men who received dutasteride vs placebo. The degree of prostate specific antigen increase after 6 months was a better indicator of clinically significant cancer in the dutasteride arm than in the placebo arm. Conversely, the initial decrease in prostate specific antigen in men taking dutasteride did not predict the likelihood of prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 131
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Chemoprevention of prostate cancer in men at high risk: Rationale and design of the reduction by dutasteride of prostate cancer events (reduce) trial [J].
Andriole, G ;
Bostwick, D ;
Brawley, O ;
Gomella, L ;
Tindall, D ;
Breed, S ;
Somerville, M ;
Rittmaster, R .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (04) :1314-1317
[2]   Clinical usefulness of serum prostate specific antigen for the detection of prostate cancer is preserved in men receiving the dual 5α-reductase inhibitor dutasteride [J].
Andriole, GL ;
Marberger, M ;
Roehrborn, CG .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (05) :1657-1662
[3]   Treatment with finasteride preserves usefulness of prostate-specific antigen in the detection of prostate cancer: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial [J].
Andriole, GL ;
Guess, HA ;
Epstein, JI ;
Wise, H ;
Kadmon, D ;
Crawford, ED ;
Hudson, P ;
Jackson, CL ;
Romas, NA ;
Patterson, L ;
Cook, TJ ;
Waldstreicher, J .
UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (02) :195-201
[4]  
Andriole GL, N ENGL J MED, V362, P1192
[5]   Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of early detected prostate cancer [J].
Bangma, C. H. ;
Roemeling, S. ;
Schroder, F. H. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 25 (01) :3-9
[6]   PSA-based screening for prostate cancer: How does it compare with other cancer screening tests? [J].
Crawford, E. David ;
Abrahamsson, Per-Anders .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (02) :262-273
[7]   Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: When should we stop? [J].
Djavan, B ;
Ravery, V ;
Zlotta, A ;
Dobronski, P ;
Dobrovits, M ;
Fakhari, M ;
Seitz, C ;
Susani, M ;
Borkowski, A ;
Boccon-Gibod, L ;
Schulman, CC ;
Marberger, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (05) :1679-1683
[8]   PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC ;
CARMICHAEL, M ;
BRENDLER, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05) :368-374
[9]   Finasteride and high-grade prostate cancer in the prostate cancer prevention trial [J].
Lucia, M. Scott ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Goodman, Phyllis J. ;
Darke, Amy K. ;
Reuter, Victor E. ;
Civantos, Francisco ;
Tangen, Catherine M. ;
Parnes, Howard L. ;
Lippman, Scott M. ;
La Rosa, Francisco G. ;
Kattan, Michael W. ;
Crawford, E. David ;
Ford, Leslie G. ;
Coltman, Charles A., Jr. ;
Thompson, Ian M. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (18) :1375-1383
[10]   Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study [J].
Roehl, KA ;
Antenor, JAV ;
Catalona, WJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (06) :2435-2439