Measuring environmental sustainability performance of South Asia

被引:135
作者
Sun, Huaping [1 ,2 ]
Mohsin, Muhammad [1 ]
Alharthi, Majed [3 ]
Abbas, Qaiser [4 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Finance & Econ, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[3] King Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Business, Finance Dept, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Ghazi Univ Dera Ghazi Khan, Dept Econ, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sustainable indicator; Sustainability index; Low carbon economy; Climate change; ENERGY SECURITY; COMPOSITE INDICATORS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; IMPACT; INDEX; CONSUMPTION; EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY; COUNTRIES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119519
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability and low-carbon economy strategies have been widely studied in the past; nevertheless, researchers often ignore the effects of combining energy, economic, and environmental factors when assessing sustainability performance. To fill this gap, we measure the environmental sustainability performance of South Asia using a common weight Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-like mathematical model encompassing a comprehensive, up-to-date, and relevant set of indicators. In this paper, we present a measurement of South Asia's environmental sustainability performance for the years 2001-2015. Our results reveal that Bhutan outperforms the rest of the countries in South Asia, with an overall index score of 0.72. Nepal comes second in the region, with a stable score, followed by the Maldives. Afghanistan and Bangladesh are ranked fourth and fifth, respectively, and their overall scores indicate strong potential sustainability performances. India, Sri Lanka and Pakistan follow this list, with poor scores, with Pakistan having the lowest scores during the study period. Based on these findings, we propose a policy to boost the cross-border renewable energy trade for long-term environmental sustainability. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[21]   A slack analysis framework for improving composite indicators with applications to human development and sustainable energy indices [J].
Hatefi, S. M. ;
Torabi, S. A. .
ECONOMETRIC REVIEWS, 2018, 37 (03) :247-259
[22]   A common weight MCDA-DEA approach to construct composite indicators [J].
Hatefi, S. M. ;
Torabi, S. A. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 70 (01) :114-120
[23]   Does environmental sustainability contribute to tourism growth? An analysis at the country level [J].
Ignacio Pulido-Fernandez, Juan ;
Juan Cardenas-Garcia, Pablo ;
Antonio Espinosa-Pulido, Juan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 213 :309-319
[24]   ENERGY SECURITY IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION [J].
Intriligator, Michael D. .
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2015, 33 (01) :221-227
[25]   Life-cycle assessment of energy consumption and environmental impact of an integrated food waste-based biogas plant [J].
Jin, Yiying ;
Chen, Ting ;
Chen, Xin ;
Yu, Zhixin .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 151 :227-236
[26]   Sustainability challenges for the south Asia growth quadrangle: A regional electricity generation sustainability assessment [J].
Khan, Imran .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 243
[27]   Corporate Environmental Management and Environmental Efficiency [J].
Khanna, Madhu ;
Kumar, Surender .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 50 (02) :227-242
[28]  
Kocaslan G., 2014, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, V4, P735
[29]   The toxic release inventory: Fact or fiction? A case study of the primary aluminum industry [J].
Koehler, Dinah A. ;
Spengler, John D. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 85 (02) :296-307
[30]   Information as regulation: The effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions [J].
Konar, S ;
Cohen, MA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 32 (01) :109-124