Influence of hyaluronan on endometrial receptivity and embryo attachment in sheep

被引:8
作者
Marei, Waleed F. A. [1 ,2 ]
Wathes, D. Claire [1 ]
Raheem, Kabir A. [1 ,3 ]
Mohey-Elsaeed, Omnia [4 ]
Ghafari, Fataneh [1 ]
Fouladi-Nashta, Ali A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Vet Coll, Reprod Grp, Dept Comparat Biomed Sci, Hawkshead Lane, N Mymms AL97TA, Herts, England
[2] Cairo Univ, Dept Theriogenol, Fac Vet Med, Giza 12211, Egypt
[3] Michael Okpara Univ Agr, Dept Vet Surg & Theriogenol, Umudike 445678, Nigeria
[4] Cairo Univ, Dept Cytol & Histol, Fac Vet Med, Giza 12211, Egypt
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
4MU; CD44; hyaluronic acid; implantation; MUC1; osteopontin; ENRICHED TRANSFER MEDIUM; PERIIMPLANTATION PERIOD; OSTEOPONTIN EXPRESSION; CONCEPTUS ATTACHMENT; MENSTRUAL-CYCLE; MOUSE UTERUS; IN-OVINE; IMPLANTATION; PREGNANCY; ACID;
D O I
10.1071/RD16232
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
An increasing number of reports suggests a role of hyaluronan (HA) in female reproduction and interest in its application in assisted reproduction is rising. However, there are contrasting data about the effectiveness of adding HA to the embryo-transfer medium on improving pregnancy rates. Using sheep as an experimental model, the studies reported here analysed the impact of HA infusion into the uterus on embryo attachment to uterine luminal epithelium (LE) and expression of selected markers of uterine receptivity. On Day 14 after natural mating (pre-attachment), uterine horns were infused with either (n=4 each): PBS (control), HA (1mg mL(-1)), HA+hyaluronidase 2 (Hyal2; 300IU mL(-1)) or 4-methyl-umbelliferone (HA-synthesis inhibitor; 4MU, 1mM). HA immunostaining on uterine sections collected on Day 17 was negative in the 4MU group and weak in the HA+Hyal2 group. In contrast to 4MU, which resulted in 100% attachment, HA infusion blocked embryo attachment in all treated animals. This was accompanied by the disappearance of mucin 1 and increased expression of osteopontin and CD44v6 in the LE of uteri with attached embryos. In conclusion, the presence of HA at the embryo-maternal interface during embryo implantation resulted in reduced endometrial receptivity and inhibited the interaction of trophoblasts with the LE, whereas clearance of HA favoured embryo attachment.
引用
收藏
页码:1763 / 1773
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Temporal variation in the distribution of hyaluronic acid, CD44s, and CD44v6 in the human endometrium across the menstrual cycle
    Afify, Alaa M.
    Craig, Sarah
    Paulino, Augusto F. G.
    [J]. APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2006, 14 (03) : 328 - 333
  • [2] Endometrial Receptivity Defects and Impaired Implantation in Diabetic NOD Mice
    Albaghdadi, Ahmad J. H.
    Kan, Frederick W. K.
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2012, 87 (02)
  • [3] Embryo implantation: the molecular mechanism remains elusive
    Aplin, J. D.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2006, 13 (06) : 833 - 839
  • [4] Aplin J D, 1997, Rev Reprod, V2, P84, DOI 10.1530/revreprod/2.2.84
  • [5] Aplin John D, 2004, Reprod Biol Endocrinol, V2, P48
  • [6] CD44 IS THE PRINCIPAL CELL-SURFACE RECEPTOR FOR HYALURONATE
    ARUFFO, A
    STAMENKOVIC, I
    MELNICK, M
    UNDERHILL, CB
    SEED, B
    [J]. CELL, 1990, 61 (07) : 1303 - 1313
  • [7] Adherence compounds in embryo transfer media for assisted reproductive technologies
    Bontekoe, Stephan
    Heineman, Maas Jan
    Johnson, Neil
    Blake, Debbie
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (02):
  • [8] MUC1: A multifunctional cell surface component of reproductive tissue epithelia
    Brayman M.
    Thathiah A.
    Carson D.D.
    [J]. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 2 (1)
  • [9] TRIENNIAL REPRODUCTION SYMPOSIUM: Deficiencies in the uterine environment and failure to support embryonic development
    Bridges, G. A.
    Day, M. L.
    Geary, T. W.
    Cruppe, L. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (07) : 3002 - 3013
  • [10] DISTRIBUTION OF HYALURONAN IN THE MOUSE ENDOMETRIUM DURING THE PERIIMPLANTATION PERIOD OF PREGNANCY
    BROWN, JJG
    PAPAIOANNOU, VE
    [J]. DIFFERENTIATION, 1992, 52 (01) : 61 - 68