Estimating Canopy Cover Via VNIR/SWIR Hyperspectral Detection Methods

被引:1
作者
Salvador, Mark Z. [1 ]
Nelson, Whitney L. [2 ]
Rall, David L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Logos Technol Inc, 4100 N Fairfax Dr, Arlington, VA 22203 USA
[2] Natl Geospatial Intelligence Agcy, Reston, VA 20191 USA
[3] EOIR Technol Inc, Fredericksburg, VA 22408 USA
来源
ALGORITHMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR MULTISPECTRAL, HYPERSPECTRAL, AND ULTRASPECTRAL IMAGERY XVI | 2010年 / 7695卷
关键词
canopy cover; hyperspectral; densiometer; hemispherical photography;
D O I
10.1117/12.850786
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Canopy cover is a significant factor in assessing the performance of target detection algorithms in forested environments. This is true of electro-optical (EO), radar frequency (RF), light detection and ranging (LIDAR), multi/hyperspectral (MSI/HSI), and other remote sensing methods. This research compares traditional ground based methods of estimating canopy closure with estimates of canopy cover via spectral detection methods applied to VNIR/SWIR hyperspectral imagery. This paper uses canopy cover and canopy closure as defined by Jennings, et al. [1]. In the Summer of 2009, a pushbroom VNIR/SWIR hyperspectral sensor collected data over a forested region of the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division, Virginia. This forested region can be best described as single canopy cover with multiple tree species. Hyperspectral imagery was collected over multiple days and at multiple altitudes in August and September, 2009. On the ground, densiometer measurements and hemispherical photography were used to estimate canopy closure at 10 meter intervals across a 2500 m(2) grid. Several spectral detection methods including vegetation indices, matched filtering, linear un-mixing, and distance measures, are used to calculate canopy coverage at varying ground sample distances and across multiple days. These multiple estimates are compared to the ground based measurements of canopy closure. Results indicate that estimates of canopy coverage via VNIR/SWIR hyperspectral imagery compare well to the ground based canopy closure estimates for this single canopy region. This would lead to the conclusion that it is possible to use airborne VNIR/SWIR hyperspectral alone to provide an accurate estimate of canopy cover.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Estimating nitrogen concentration in rape from hyperspectral data at canopy level using support vector machines
    Wang, Fumin
    Huang, Jingfeng
    Wang, Yuan
    Liu, Zhanyu
    Zhang, Fayao
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2013, 14 (02) : 172 - 183
  • [32] Study on Estimating Pigment Contents in Canopy of Chinese Fir under Disease Stress Based on Hyperspectral Data
    Li Hongjun
    Tan Yimin
    Zang Zhuo
    Liu Junang
    Liu Qianli
    Zhou Guoying
    2014 THIRD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON EARTH OBSERVATION AND REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS (EORSA 2014), 2014,
  • [33] Estimating nitrogen concentration in rape from hyperspectral data at canopy level using support vector machines
    Fumin Wang
    Jingfeng Huang
    Yuan Wang
    Zhanyu Liu
    Fayao Zhang
    Precision Agriculture, 2013, 14 : 172 - 183
  • [34] Aerial detection of beached marine plastic using a novel, hyperspectral short-wave infrared (SWIR) camera
    Cocking, Jennifer
    Narayanaswamy, Bhavani E.
    Waluda, Claire M.
    Williamson, Benjamin J.
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 79 (03) : 648 - 660
  • [35] Methods of Hyperspectral Detection Based on a Single Signature Sample
    Schaum, Alan
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (03) : 518 - 523
  • [36] Estimating canopy leaf nitrogen concentration in winter wheat based on multi-angular hyperspectral remote sensing
    He, Li
    Zhang, Hai-Yan
    Zhang, Yuan-Shuai
    Song, Xiao
    Feng, Wei
    Kang, Guo-Zhang
    Wang, Chen-Yang
    Guo, Tian-Cai
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2016, 73 : 170 - 185
  • [37] Gaseous plume detection in hyperspectral images: a comparison of methods
    Messinger, DW
    ALGORITHMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR MULTISPECTRAL, HYPERSPECTRAL, AND ULTRASPECTRAL IMAGERY X, 2004, 5425 : 592 - 603
  • [38] A comparison of ground-based methods for estimating canopy closure for use in phenology research
    Smith, Alison M.
    Ramsay, Paul M.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2018, 252 : 18 - 26
  • [39] Canopy Cover Estimation in Semiarid Woodlands: Comparison of Field-Based and Remote Sensing Methods
    Ko, Dongwook
    Bristow, Nathan
    Greenwood, David
    Weisberg, Peter
    FOREST SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (02) : 132 - 141
  • [40] The estimation of canopy attributes from digital cover photography by two different image analysis methods
    Chianucci, Francesco
    Chiavetta, Ugo
    Cutini, Andrea
    IFOREST-BIOGEOSCIENCES AND FORESTRY, 2014, 7 : 255 - 259