Wind turbine evaluation using the hesitant fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method with a case in Turkey

被引:34
作者
Beskese, Ahmet [1 ]
Camci, Alper [2 ]
Temur, Gul Tekin [1 ]
Erturk, Ercan [3 ]
机构
[1] Bahcesehir Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Ciragan Caddesi 4, TR-34353 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Bahcesehir Univ, Dept Management Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Bahcesehir Univ, Sch Appl Disciplines, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Wind turbine; hesitant fuzzy sets; hesitant fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS; multi criteria decision making; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; MODEL; SELECTION;
D O I
10.3233/JIFS-179464
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
As energy security concerns push the countries to find more sustainable and renewable sources of energy, wind power became one of the fastest growing renewable energy source. As only a handful of wind turbine manufacturers established foothold in world markets, it is essential for managers to make right decisions regarding which wind turbines they will install in any given project. This study explores the literature on the wind turbine selection, solicits opinions of the industry experts to come up with a more realistic set of criteria and develops a decision making tool integrating hesitant fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with Technique-for-Order-Preference-by-Similarity-to-Ideal-Solution (TOPSIS). As wind turbine selection problem includes both quantitative and qualitative criteria, it is difficult to tackle with high uncertainty by using traditional techniques. Thus, hesitant fuzzy sets (HFS) which is an evolved fuzzy tool that deals with vagueness is utilized. In this study, hesitant fuzzy AHP is utilized to overcome the ambiguity, which occurs during criteria prioritization. In order to rank the alternatives, hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS is applied. By the help of this integrated approach, evaluation process becomes systematic and easy to deal with vagueness. The proposed method is demonstrated by a case study in Turkey.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1011
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Sustainability analysis of different hydrogen production options using hesitant fuzzy AHP [J].
Acar, Canan ;
Beskese, Ahmet ;
Temur, Gul Tekin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (39) :18059-18076
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, TRUMAN TALLEY BOOKS
[4]   TOPSIS for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets [J].
Beg, Ismat ;
Rashid, Tabasam .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (12) :1162-1171
[5]  
Bolturk E., 2016, International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, V8, P271, DOI DOI 10.13033/IJAHP.V8I2.387
[6]   CNC router selection for SMEs in woodwork manufacturing using hesitant fuzzy AHP method [J].
Camci, Alper ;
Temur, Gul Tekin ;
Beskese, Ahmet .
JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 31 (04) :529-549
[7]   A multicriteria approach to evaluate wind energy plants on an Italian island [J].
Cavallaro, F ;
Ciraolo, L .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (02) :235-244
[8]   A combined fuzzy approach to determine the best region for a nuclear power plant in Turkey [J].
Erdogan, Melike ;
Kaya, Ihsan .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 39 :84-93
[9]   Selecting firms in University technoparks: A hesitant linguistic fuzzy TOPSIS model for heterogeneous contexts [J].
Estrella, Francisco J. ;
Onar, Sezi Cevik ;
Rodriguez, Rosa M. ;
Oztaysi, Basar ;
Martinez, Luis ;
Kahraman, Cengiz .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 33 (02) :1155-1172
[10]   On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights [J].
Filev, D ;
Yager, RR .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 94 (02) :157-169