Bone marrow quality in chemically prepared dogs

被引:0
|
作者
Rocha, Thiago A. S. S. [1 ]
Queiroz, Andrea B. P. S. [1 ]
Zero, Raphael C. [1 ]
Oliveira, Fabricio S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Agr & Vet Sci, Dept Anim Morphol & Physiol, Via Acesso Paulo Donato Castelane S-N, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Anatomy; Conservation; Orthopedics; Surgery; PRESERVATION; CADAVERS; ANATOMY;
D O I
10.52083/JHHV2096
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
Besides preventing deterioration, conservation also prevents the proliferation of pathogens that cause diseases in those who work in laboratories. This research aimed to evaluate the color of the bone marrow of chemically prepared dog corpses, seeking to determine whether long-term preservation maintains their original morphological aspect. Fifty cadavers of adult dogs were used. The control group (G0) consisted of fresh corpses; the others were fixed in curing salt solution (20% sodium chloride, 1% nitrite, and 1% sodium nitrate) (120 ml/Kg) and ethanol with 5% glycerin (120 ml/Kg). Cadavers were assessed at 30 days (G30), 60 days (G60), 90 days(G90), and 120 days (G120). In addition, two veterinary observers evaluated the long bones' bone marrow during a biomechanical compression test after a fracture. Qualitative bone marrow color variables were transformed into scores, in which 0=excellent (more vivid than fresh cadaver), 1=good (similar to G0), 2=poor (darker than G0), and 3 congruent to bad (rotten appearance, brownish). By Dunn's test, the bone marrow of the bones was better at 30 days when compared to G0 (G0>G30), G0 G60 and G0<90, and G0 provided a better bone marrow aspect between 30 to 60 days after fixation.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 197
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CYTOLOGIC RESPONSE OF DOGS TO WEEKLY BONE-MARROW COLLECTIONS
    MITEMA, ES
    VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1985, 80 (04) : 37 - 38
  • [32] STERNAL BONE MARROW ASPIRATION IN CLINICALLY NORMAL SMALL DOGS
    Defarges, A.
    Abrams-Ogg, A.
    Bienzle, D.
    Foster, R.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (03) : 683 - 684
  • [33] STUDIES IN PRESSURES RECORDED WITHIN BONE MARROW CAVITIES IN DOGS
    VAWTER, GF
    RASGON, IM
    MARBARGER, JP
    FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1951, 10 (01) : 140 - 140
  • [34] AN APPRAISAL OF BONE-MARROW BIOPSY IN ASSESSMENT OF SICK DOGS
    HOFF, B
    LUMSDEN, JH
    VALLI, VEO
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE MEDICINE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE MEDECINE COMPAREE, 1985, 49 (01): : 34 - 42
  • [35] Bone marrow cytological evaluation in dogs with chronic kidney disease
    Borin-Crivellenti, S.
    Crivellenti, L. Z.
    Carvalho, M. B.
    Santana, A. E.
    ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2014, 66 (06) : 1751 - 1756
  • [36] INFLUENCE OF DLA ANTIGENS ON BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION IN DOGS
    KOLB, HJ
    REIDER, I
    GROSSWILDE, H
    SCHOLZ, S
    KOLB, H
    SCHAFFER, E
    ALBERT, ED
    THIERFELDER, S
    EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY, 1977, 5 : 45 - 45
  • [37] Bone marrow, blood, and clinical findings in dogs treated with phenobarbital
    Scott, Tiffany N.
    Bailin, H. Grady
    Jutkowitz, L. Ari
    Scott, Michael A.
    Lucidi, Cynthia A.
    VETERINARY CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 50 (01) : 122 - 131
  • [38] BONE MARROW ALLOGRAFTS IN THYMECTOMIZED X-IRRADIATED DOGS
    CHERTKOV, IL
    MAXIMENK.AS
    NOVIKOVA, MN
    RAUSHENB.MO
    NATURE, 1965, 208 (5008) : 399 - &
  • [39] LASTING ENGRAFTMENT OF HISTOINCOMPATIBLE BONE-MARROW CELLS IN DOGS
    VRIESENDORP, HM
    KLAPWIJK, WM
    VANKESSEL, AMC
    ZURCHER, C
    VANBEKKUM, DW
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1981, 31 (05) : 347 - 352