Where Self-Interest Trumps Ideology: Liberal Homeowners and Local Opposition to Housing Development

被引:44
作者
Marble, William [1 ]
Nall, Clayton [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Encina Hall West,Rm 100,616 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Polit Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
homeownership; self-interest; local politics; ideology; housing; GROWTH; RENT; CITY;
D O I
10.1086/711717
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
How much does self-interest drive Americans' policy attitudes? Survey research typically finds that self-interest's role is minimal. Such conclusions are typically reached by examining attitudes toward federal policies that present diffuse costs and low stakes. We consider a starker test case of self-interest: controversies surrounding development of dense and affordable housing in Americans' communities. Liberal homeowners, especially, must cope with dissonance between their egalitarian ideology and a desire to protect their home values and quality of life. They often embrace liberal housing goals and redistributive housing policies but join conservatives in opposing dense housing in their own communities. Two survey experiments show that liberal homeowners are cross-pressured and barely more likely than conservative homeowners to support dense housing development. Messages appealing to homeowners' self-interest reduce support further, while countervailing appeals about housing's benefits to low- and middle-income families barely offset the negative effect. We discuss implications for the politics of equal opportunity at the state and local level.
引用
收藏
页码:1747 / 1763
页数:17
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Explaining Preferences from Behavior: A Cognitive Dissonance Approach
    Acharya, Avidit
    Blackwell, Matthew
    Sen, Maya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2018, 80 (02) : 400 - 411
  • [2] Achen Christopher H., 2016, DEMOCRACY REALISTS W
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, San Francisco Home Prices and Values
  • [4] Aronson E., 1969, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60075-1, 10.1016/S0065-2601, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601]
  • [5] Aronson E., 1968, THEORIES COGNITIVE C, P5
  • [6] Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America
    Barber, Michael
    Pope, Jeremy C.
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2019, 113 (01) : 38 - 54
  • [7] Bartels L., 2005, Perspectives on Politics, V3, P15, DOI [10.1017/s1537592705050036, DOI 10.1017/S1537592705050036]
  • [8] Bartels LM, 2008, UNEQUAL DEMOCRACY: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE NEW GILDED AGE, P1
  • [9] Brinklow A., 2018, CURBED SF
  • [10] Campbell AndreaL., 2003, POLICIES MAKE CITIZE