Attitudes to radiation safety and cholangiogram interpretation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a UK survey

被引:7
|
作者
Siau, Keith [1 ,2 ]
Webster, George [3 ]
Wright, Mark [4 ]
Maher, Ben [5 ]
Stedman, Brian [5 ]
Johnson, Gavin [3 ]
Ahmad, Saqib [6 ]
Tehami, Nadeem [7 ]
机构
[1] Dudley Grp Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Gastroenterol, Dudley DY1 2HQ, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Gastroenterol, London, England
[4] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Hepatol, Southampton, Hants, England
[5] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Intervent Radiol, Southampton, Hants, England
[6] Sherwood Forest Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Gastroenterol, Sutton In Ashfield, England
[7] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Gastroenterol, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
endoscopic retrograde pancreatography; endoscopy; endoscopic procedures; EXPOSURE; PROTECTION; PATIENT; FLUOROSCOPY; EFFICACY; TIME;
D O I
10.1136/flgastro-2020-101521
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Fluoroscopy during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) exposes staff and patients to potentially harmful ionizing radiation. We performed a UK survey to explore trainee and trainer attitudes to radiation protection and cholangiogram interpretation in ERCP. Methods An electronic 10-point survey was prospectively distributed to endoscopy unit leads, training programme directors between October and November 2019. Only UK-based ERCP trainees and trainers with hands-on procedural exposure were eligible for the survey. Results The survey was completed by 107 respondents (58 trainees and 49 trainers), with an estimated overall response rate of 46%. Overall, 49% of respondents were up to date with their radiation protection course, 38% were aware of European Basic safety standards directive (BSSD), 38% wore radiation protection goggles, and 40% were aware of the average radiation screening dose per ERCP procedure. Compared with trainers, trainees were less likely to routinely wear thyroid protection shields (76% vs 92%; p=0.028), have awareness of the BSSD (20% vs 49%; p=0.037) or know their average procedural radiation dosages (21% vs 63%; p<0.001). With regard to cholangiogram interpretation, only 26% had received formal training, with 97% of trainees expressing a desire for further training. Conclusion This survey highlights a relative complacency in safety attitudes to radiation protection during ERCP. These data provide impetus to improve training and quality assurance in radiation protection, which should be regarded as a mandatory safety aspect prior to commencing hands-on ERCP training.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 556
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient Safety and Care After Outpatient Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A Single-Center Experience in Germany
    Trung, Kien Vu
    Feisthammel, Juergen
    Hoffmeister, Albrecht
    Karlas, Thomas
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2025,
  • [22] Minimizing radiation exposure in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a review for medical personnel
    Oh, Chi Hyuk
    Son, Byoung Kwan
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (06) : 1111 - 1119
  • [23] Evaluation of staff, patient and foetal radiation doses due to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures in a pregnant patient
    Huda, A.
    Garzon, W. J.
    Filho, G. C. L.
    Vieira, B.
    Kramer, R.
    Xu, X. G.
    Gao, Y.
    Khoury, H. J.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2016, 168 (03) : 401 - 407
  • [24] Systematic review of safety and efficacy of therapeutic endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy including studies of radiation-free therapeutic endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography
    Cappell, Mitchell S.
    Stavropoulos, Stavros Nicholas
    Friedel, David
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 10 (10): : 308 - 321
  • [25] Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): outcomes of 3136 cases over 10 years
    Atamanalp, Sabri Selcuk
    Yildirgan, Mehmet Ilhan
    Kantarci, Abdulmecit
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 41 (04) : 615 - 621
  • [26] A Survey of the Radiation Exposure Protection of Health Care Providers during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Korea
    Shin, Jae Min
    Lee, Tae Hoon
    Park, Sang-Heum
    Kang, Sang Goo
    Lee, Yeon Seon
    Park, Suk Ja
    Ku, Mi Gyeong
    Lee, Suck-Ho
    Chung, Il-Kwun
    Choi, Hyun Jong
    Moon, Jong Ho
    Cha, Sang Woo
    Cho, Young Deok
    Kim, Sun-Joo
    GUT AND LIVER, 2013, 7 (01) : 100 - 105
  • [27] ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP): ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF THE PROCEDURE IN THE PATIENT WITH ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS
    Ivano, Flavio Heuta
    Ponte, Bruno Jeronimo
    Dubik, Thais Caroline
    Ivano, Victor Kenzo
    Locatelli Winkeler, Vitoria Luiza
    Kay, Antonio Katsumi
    ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (02):
  • [28] Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) outcomes can improve after further training for an individual already experienced in ERCP
    Choi, J.
    Malik, N.
    Drachman, D.
    Adler, D.
    Nadir, A.
    MINERVA GASTROENTEROLOGICA E DIETOLOGICA, 2015, 61 (03) : 117 - 120
  • [29] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient Positioning During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Procedures
    Meeusen, Vera
    Kim, Mijin
    Ma, Regan
    Roque, Marilyn
    Sivalingam, Pal
    Hamarneh, Zaki
    Hourigan, Luke
    GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING, 2025, 48 (01) : 51 - 61
  • [30] In-depth exploration of the radiation exposure to staff performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures (ERCP) through RANDO phantom and TLDs
    Kesmezacar, Fahrettin Fatih
    Tuncman, Duygu
    Nayci, Ali Emre
    Gunay, Osman
    Yeyin, Nami
    Uzum, Gungor
    Demir, Mustafa
    Akkus, Baki
    Elshami, Wiam
    Almisned, Ghada
    Tekin, H. O.
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 42 (09) : 1058 - 1066