Stratification and management of patients ineligible for lung cancer screening

被引:0
作者
Aggarwal, Reenika [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lam, Andrew Cl [1 ,3 ]
Huang, Jingyue [4 ]
Hueniken, Katrina [1 ]
Nguyen, Daniel [1 ]
Khan, Khaleeq [1 ]
Shaikh, Taariq [1 ]
Shepherd, Frances A. [1 ,3 ]
Tsao, Ming-Sound [5 ,6 ]
Xu, Wei [2 ,4 ]
Kavanagh, John [7 ]
Liu, Geoffrey [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Div Med Oncol, 610 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, 155 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, 1 Kings Coll Cir, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
[4] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, 610 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Pathol, Lab Med, 585 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5B 2N2, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, 101 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada
[7] Univ Hlth Network, Joint Dept Med Imaging, 263 McCaul St, Toronto, ON M5T 1W7, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, 1 Kings Coll Cir, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
[9] Univ Toronto, Pharmacol & Toxicol, 1 Kings Coll Cir, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
关键词
Lung cancer; Mass screening; Computed tomography; Risk assessment; Patient selection; Statistical models; DOSE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; SMOKING-CESSATION; MORTALITY; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106610
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study identifies participants ineligible for lung cancer screening with the greatest likelihood of future eligibility. Lung cancer risk in participants enrolled in longitudinal lung screening was assessed using the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian lung cancer risk calculator (PLCOm2012) at two timepoints: baseline (T-1) and follow-up (T-2). Separate analyses were performed on four PLCOm2012 eligibility thresholds (3.25%, 2.00%, 1.50%, and 1.00%); only participants with a T-1 risk less than the threshold were included in that analysis. Cox models identified T-1 risk factors associated with screen-eligibility at T-2. Three models, applying differing assumptions of participant behavior, predicted future eligibility and were benchmarked against the observed cohort. Nine hundred and fifty-six participants had a T-1 risk 3.25%; at 2.00% n= 755; at 1.50% n= 652; at 1.00% n= 484. Lung cancer risk increased over time in most screen-ineligible participants. However, risk increased much faster in participants who became screen-eligible at T-2 compared to those who remained screen ineligible (median per-year increase of 0.35% versus 0.02%, when using a 3.25% threshold). Participants smoking for 30 years, current smokers, less educated participants, and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at T-1 were significantly more likely to become screen-eligible. New diagnoses of COPD and/or non-lung cancers between T-1 and T-2 precipitated eligibility in a subset of participants. The prediction model that assumed health behaviors observed at T-1 continued to T-2 reasonably predicted changes in lung cancer risk. This prediction model and the identified baseline risk factors can identify screen-ineligible participants who should be closely followed for future eligibility.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[2]   Outcomes of Long-term Interval Rescreening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer in Different Risk Cohorts [J].
Aggarwal, Reenika ;
Lam, Andrew C. L. ;
McGregor, Maureen ;
Menezes, Ravi ;
Hueniken, Katrina ;
Tateishi, Hannah ;
O'Kane, Grainne M. ;
Tsao, Ming Sound ;
Shepherd, Frances A. ;
Xu, Wei ;
McInnis, Micheal ;
Schmidt, Heidi ;
Liu, Geoffrey ;
Kavanagh, John .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (06) :1003-1011
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, CAG00439N CTR MED ME
[4]   Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial [J].
Brain, Kate ;
Carter, Ben ;
Lifford, Kate J. ;
Burke, Olivia ;
Devaraj, Anand ;
Baldwin, David R. ;
Duffy, Stephen ;
Field, John K. .
THORAX, 2017, 72 (10) :912-918
[5]   Mind the Gap: Disparities in Cigarette Smoking in Canada [J].
Chaiton, Michael ;
Callard, Cynthia .
TOBACCO USE INSIGHTS, 2019, 12
[6]   Estimating the number of quit attempts it takes to quit smoking successfully in a longitudinal cohort of smokers [J].
Chaiton, Michael ;
Diemert, Lori ;
Cohen, Joanna E. ;
Bondy, Susan J. ;
Selby, Peter ;
Philipneri, Anne ;
Schwartz, Robert .
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (06)
[7]   Identifying teachable moments for health behavior counseling in primary care [J].
Cohen, Deborah J. ;
Clark, Elizabeth C. ;
Lawson, Peter J. ;
Casucci, Brad A. ;
Flocke, Susan A. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2011, 85 (02) :E8-E15
[8]   Tobacco Product Use Among Adults - United States, 2019 [J].
Cornelius, Monica E. ;
Wang, Teresa W. ;
Jamal, Ahmed ;
Loretan, Caitlin G. ;
Neff, Linda J. .
MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2020, 69 (46) :1736-1742
[9]   This Week in the Journal [J].
de Koning, H. J. ;
van der Aalst, C. M. ;
de Jong, P. A. ;
Scholten, E. T. ;
Nackaerts, K. ;
Heuvelmans, M. A. ;
Lammers, J. -W. J. ;
Weenink, C. ;
Yousaf-Khan, U. ;
Horeweg, N. ;
van't Westeinde, S. ;
Prokop, M. ;
Mali, W. P. ;
Hoesein, F. A. A. Mohamed ;
van Ooijen, P. M. A. ;
Aerts, J. G. J. V. ;
den Bakker, M. A. ;
Thunnissen, E. ;
Verschakelen, J. ;
Vliegenthart, R. ;
Walter, J. E. ;
ten Haaf, K. ;
Groen, H. J. M. ;
Oudkerk, M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (06) :503-513
[10]  
Evans William K, 2020, CMAJ Open, V8, pE585, DOI 10.9778/cmajo.20190134