Water resource quality effects on water treatment costs: An analysis for the Brazilian case

被引:6
作者
Danelon, Andre Felipe [1 ]
Augusto, Fernanda Gaudio [2 ]
Silva Spolador, Humberto Francisco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Dept Econ, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Ctr Nucl Energy Agr, Lab Isotope Ecol, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
关键词
Sanitation; Productivity; Land use change; Ecosystem services; LAND-USE; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107134
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The cost effects of water resource quality on water treatment are critical factors for firms' performance. However, few economic studies incorporate water quality parameters into cost functions. This study's main contribution was to combine data on Brazilian water treatment companies and surface water monitoring stations to produce a unique panel data set from 2003 to 2017, and then estimate the effects of water quality on water treatment costs. Based on a panel model with fixed effect approach, our findings show that disturbances on turbidity have significant effects on optimal costs. On average, one-percent increase in turbidity increases the costs in 0.1162%. Therefore, the results indicate that water treatment companies have incentives to improve water resource quality in the long run, which should be considered by regulatory agencies to connect economic incentives and landscape protection.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems
    Allan, JD
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2004, 35 : 257 - 284
  • [2] Quantifying climate, streamflow, and watershed control on water quality across Southeastern US watersheds
    Alnahit, Ali O.
    Mishra, Ashok K.
    Khan, Abdul A.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 739 (739)
  • [3] ANA-Agencia Nacional dasAguas, 2019, PORT MET GEOESP ANA
  • [4] Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, Econometric analysis of panel data
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, UN WORLD WAT DEV REP
  • [7] Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing
    Baum, Christopher F.
    Schaffer, Mark E.
    Stillman, Steven
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2003, 3 (01) : 1 - 31
  • [8] Brasil, 2013, PLAN NAC SAN BAS PLA
  • [9] Chapman D., 1996, Water Quality Assessments: A Guide to the Use of Biota, Sediments and Water in Environmental Monitoring, DOI DOI 10.4324/NOE0419216001
  • [10] Ecosystem services of the Guarapiranga Reservoir watershed (Sao Paulo, Brazil): value of water supply and implications for management strategies
    de Brito, Felipo Meireles
    El Khouri Miraglia, Simone Georges
    Semensatto, Decio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 10 (01): : 49 - 59