The effect of air staged, co-combustion of pulverised coal and biomass blends on NOx emissions and combustion efficiency

被引:121
作者
Munir, S. [1 ]
Nimmo, W. [1 ]
Gibbs, B. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Proc Environm & Mat Engn, Energy & Resources Res Inst, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Co-firing; Air-staged; Un-staged; Biomass; Over-fire air; SUGAR-CANE BAGASSE; COTTON STALK; OPTIMIZATION; TECHNOLOGY; REDUCTION; NITROGEN; KINETICS; FURNACE; CHAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2010.07.052
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Co-firing of biomass residues with coal is continuously increasing in it's application in coal-fired boilers for electricity production. In this study, co-firing experiments were performed using a Russian coal with a range of biomasses, shea meal (SM), cotton stalk (CS), sugarcane bagasse (SBT), sugarcane bagasse (SBR) and wood chips (WC) as biomasses in 5%, 10% and 15% thermal fractions to evaluate their potential as substitute fuel and an agent for NOx control. It was found that the addition of biomass increased NO reduction under both un-staged and air-staged conditions. However, NO reductions obtained under optimum conditions of primary zone stoichiometry (SR1 = 0.9) and over-fire air (OFA) injection port location 3, were found to be significantly higher than un-staged co-firing for the same biomass thermal share in the fuel blend. It was found that the addition of biomass has a positive effect on carbon burnout under the optimum conditions that were determined in the study. A 10% biomass blending ratio (BBR) was found to be optimum for air-staging conditions. When co-fired under optimum air-staged conditions, a 10% BBR of sugarcane bagasse (SBR), shea meal (SM), wood chips (WC), cotton stalk (CS) and sugarcane bagasse (SBT) in coal gave NO reduction of 49%, 51%, 53%, 60% and 72%, respectively. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 135
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Cotton stalk as a potential energy source [J].
Akdeniz, RC ;
Acaroglu, M ;
Hepbasli, A .
ENERGY SOURCES, 2004, 26 (01) :65-75
[2]  
[Anonymous], REN21
[3]  
BAI XO, 2000, IEA BIOEN TASK 19 BI
[4]   Biomass-coal co-combustion: opportunity for affordable renewable energy [J].
Baxter, L .
FUEL, 2005, 84 (10) :1295-1302
[5]   Combustion technology developments in power generation in response to environmental challenges [J].
Beér, JM .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2000, 26 (4-6) :301-327
[6]   Characterization of coal char and biomass char reactivities to oxygen [J].
Campbell, PA ;
Mitchell, RE ;
Ma, LQ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2002, 29 (01) :519-526
[7]   Char oxidation study of sugar cane bagasse, cotton stalk and Pakistani coal under 1% and 3% oxygen concentrations [J].
Daood, Syed S. ;
Munir, Shahid ;
Nimmo, William ;
Gibbs, Bernard M. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2010, 34 (03) :263-271
[8]  
DEFRA, 2007, UK Biomass Strategy
[9]   The kinetics of combustion of chars derived from sewage sludge [J].
Dennis, JS ;
Lambert, RJ ;
Milne, AJ ;
Scott, SA ;
Hayhurst, AN .
FUEL, 2005, 84 (2-3) :117-126
[10]   Combustion and gasification rates of lignocellulosic chars [J].
Di Blasi, Colomba .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2009, 35 (02) :121-140