Additive manufacturing of biomaterials for bone tissue engineering - A critical review of the state of the art and new concepts

被引:106
作者
Germaini, Marie-Michele [1 ]
Belhabib, Sofiane [2 ]
Guessasma, Sofiane [3 ]
Deterre, Remi
Corre, Pierre [1 ]
Weiss, Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Angers, Nantes Univ, Oniris, CHU Nantes,INSERM,RMeS,UMR 1229, F-44000 Nantes, France
[2] Nantes Univ, Oniris, CNRS, GEPEA,UMR 6144, F-44000 Nantes, France
[3] INRAE, Biopolymers UR1268, Assembly Interact, F-44300 Nantes, France
关键词
Bone regeneration; Biomaterial; Additive manufacturing; Modeling; Design optimization; Material and process selection; 3D imaging; CALCIUM-PHOSPHATE CEMENT; POLYCAPROLACTONE SCAFFOLDS; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; POROUS HYDROXYAPATITE; SURFACE-STRUCTURE; TRABECULAR BONE; TITANIUM-ALLOY; GROWTH-FACTORS; 3D CT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100963
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing has attracted keen interest in the medical field in recent decades, especially for bone regeneration. Many additive manufacturing processes have been used to print medical devices such as implants, prostheses, and surgical guides, and for surgical planning in different medical fields, especially orthopedic, maxillofacial and dental surgery. Many materials can be manufactured by 3D printing with metal, ceramic, polymer or composite materials. Composite materials with organic and mineral components have been investigated to mimic bone functional and structural characteristics. In addition to the chemical composition, the modeling and optimization of the design can be optimized to enhance the biological and mechanical performance of the printed scaffolds. This review presents a comparative evaluation of different material/additive manufacturing processes, and describes the best compromises for targeted clinical applications. The advantages and drawbacks of each additive manufacturing process are described in light of the biological results and essential properties expected by patients and clinicians. Statement of significance: 3D (bio)printing appears to be an outstanding manufacturing route to revolutionize patient care with personalized medicine. Moreover, there are growing trends in the use of 3D printing in the medical education field and for surgical planning to alleviate surgeon practice and optimize esthetic results. Many reviews have described the growth of the different additive manufacturing techniques developed over time, their advantages and drawbacks and the work required to develop an accurate printable biomaterial fitting the 3D additive manufacturing process and the expectations of the final users and beneficiaries. In this review, an emphasis is placed on the expectations of patients and clinicians regarding specific final clinical applications in craniomaxillofacial, orthopedic or dental fields for a specific biomaterial/additive material
引用
收藏
页数:43
相关论文
共 223 条
[1]   Foreign body reaction to biomaterials [J].
Anderson, James M. ;
Rodriguez, Analiz ;
Chang, David T. .
SEMINARS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2008, 20 (02) :86-100
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1173712018AMD12021 I
[3]  
[Anonymous], ISO / ASTM52900 - 15 Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing - General Principles - Terminology
[4]  
[Anonymous], 5562 NF EN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 5561 NF EN
[6]  
[Anonymous], ISO 233172014
[7]   Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials [J].
Anselme, K .
BIOMATERIALS, 2000, 21 (07) :667-681
[8]   Stereolithography of three-dimensional bioactive poly(ethylene glycol) constructs with encapsulated cells [J].
Arcaute, Karina ;
Mann, Brenda K. ;
Wicker, Ryan B. .
ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 34 (09) :1429-1441
[9]   MATERIALS SELECTION IN MECHANICAL DESIGN [J].
ASHBY, MF ;
CEBON, D .
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE IV, 1993, 3 (C7) :1-9
[10]  
Babak Jahani, RECENT PROG MAT ADDI