USE THE SILVER BULLET ON THE RIGHT BEAST: A GUIDE ON USAGE OF PLS-SEM IN TOURISM AND GASTRONOMY STUDIES

被引:2
作者
Aybek, Gurkan [1 ]
Karakas, Hatice [2 ]
机构
[1] Akdeniz Univ, Fac Tourism, Gastron & Culinary Arts, Antalya, Turkey
[2] Akdeniz Univ, Fac Tourism, Tourism Management, Antalya, Turkey
来源
ADVANCES IN HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM RESEARCH-AHTR | 2022年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
PLS-SEM; tourism; gastronomy; methodology; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; SATISFACTION; INFORMATION; LOYALTY; QUALITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.30519/ahtr.1097884
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PLS based Structural Equation Modelling approach widens in social research with its benefits to ease some methodological struggles. As a matter of course, tourism and gastronomy fields gladly accept this advantage since the researchers mainly contain end-users in terms of statistical competence. However, this extensive use may come with some misunderstandings and errors during the conduction of the technique. Therefore, this editorial research note aims to point out common misunderstandings that appear while using PLS-SEM in tourism and gastronomy research and to guide to prevent them. The literature offered the basis of these misconductions but detected issues have mostly dug out from the unobtrusive statistical editorial experience of the authors.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 336
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Culture, Quality of life, Globalization and Beyond [J].
Abdel-Hadi, Aleya .
ACE-BS 2012 BANGKOK, 2012, 50 :11-19
[2]   An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research [J].
Ali, Faizan ;
Rasoolimanesh, S. Mostafa ;
Sarstedt, Marko ;
Ringle, Christian M. ;
Ryu, Kisang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 30 (01) :514-538
[3]   CULTURAL DESTINATION ATTRIBUTES, OVERALL TOURIST SATISFACTION AND TOURIST LOYALTY: FIRST TIMERS VERSUS REPEATERS [J].
Atsiz, Ozan ;
Akova, Orhan .
ADVANCES IN HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM RESEARCH-AHTR, 2021, 9 (02) :268-291
[4]   Hierarchical Latent Variable Models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for Using Reflective-Formative Type Models [J].
Becker, Jan-Michael ;
Klein, Kristina ;
Wetzels, Martin .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2012, 45 (5-6) :359-394
[5]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[6]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[7]   Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement [J].
Coltman, Tim ;
Devinney, Timothy M. ;
Midgley, David F. ;
Venaik, Sunil .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2008, 61 (12) :1250-1262
[8]   CONSTRUCT VALIDITY IN PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS [J].
CRONBACH, LJ ;
MEEHL, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1955, 52 (04) :281-302
[9]   CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting [J].
Dash, Ganesh ;
Paul, Justin .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 173
[10]   Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration [J].
Diamantopoulos, Adamantios ;
Siguaw, Judy A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2006, 17 (04) :263-282