Development and validation of the health-related quality of life instrument for Chinese infertile couples: a mixed-methods study protocol

被引:1
作者
Shi, Zhao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mao, Zhuxin [4 ]
Nie, Hongwei [5 ]
Geng, Ling [5 ]
Chen, Gang [6 ]
Li, Shunping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Cheeloo Coll Med, Ctr Hlth Management & Policy Res, Sch Publ Hlth, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, NHC Key Lab Hlth Econ & Policy Res, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Ctr Hlth Preference Res, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
[4] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Insurance, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[5] Shandong Univ, Cheeloo Coll Med, Ctr Reprod Med, Jinan 250001, Peoples R China
[6] Monash Univ, Monash Business Sch, Ctr Hlth Econ, Melbourne, Vic 3145, Australia
关键词
Infertile couples; Health-related quality of life; Instrument; Validation; Chinese; Protocol; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; CONTENT VALIDITY; CONCEPTUAL-MODEL; GLOSSARY;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-022-01957-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Infertility and its treatment have negative impacts on a couple's marital relationship, sexual life, psychological state and interpersonal relationships, causing personal distress. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an important component of health outcomes. HRQoL instruments developed in western culture are not always appropriate for use in China due to cultural differences. Probably due to the unique concept of fertility in China, infertility patients can be looked down upon and the family may feel shameful. This study aims to develop a HRQoL instrument for infertile couples based on the Chinese social and cultural setting. Methods Complementary mixed methods will be used to develop a new HRQoL instrument for Chinese infertile couples. The study consists of four stages: the first stage will involve a systematic review and qualitative interviews to construct draft candidate items. In the second stage, quantitative research [e.g., exploratory factor analysis (EFA), item response theory (IRT)] and cognitive interviews will be used for item selection. The third stage will be instrument validation, in which classical test theory (CTT) and IRT will be applied. In the final stage, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) will be calculated by using distribution-based methods and anchor-based methods (e.g., logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curve). Discussion The new HRQoL instrument for Chinese infertile couples will be developed, which will provide a standard and effective HRQoL instrument in clinical outcome assessment and health outcome measurement.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   The minimal clinically important difference raised the significance of outcome effects above the statistical level, with methodological implications for future studies [J].
Angst, Felix ;
Aeschlimann, Andre ;
Angst, Jules .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 82 :128-136
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, The Beijing News.
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, WHAT DOES INFERTILIT
[5]   The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties [J].
Boivin, Jacky ;
Takefman, Janet ;
Braverman, Andrea .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (08) :2084-2091
[6]  
Braun V., 2008, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P101
[7]   Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review [J].
Chachamovich, Juliana Rigol ;
Chachamovich, Eduardo ;
Ezer, Helene ;
Fleck, Marcelo P. ;
Knauth, Daniela ;
Passos, Eduardo P. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 31 (02) :101-110
[8]  
Chen Z., 2019, CHIN J OBSTET GYNECO, V54
[9]   Comparing health-related quality of life of Dutch and Chinese patients with traumatic brain injury: do cultural differences play a role? [J].
Cnossen, Maryse C. ;
Polinder, Suzanne ;
Vos, Pieter E. ;
Lingsma, Hester F. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Sun, Yanming ;
Ye, Pengpeng ;
Duan, Leilei ;
Haagsma, Juanita A. .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2017, 15
[10]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297