In vitro starch digestibility, expected glycemic index, and thermal and pasting properties of flours from pea, lentil and chickpea cultivars

被引:164
作者
Chung, Hyun-Jung [1 ]
Liu, Qiang [1 ]
Hoover, Ratnajothi [2 ]
Warkentin, Tom D. [3 ]
Vandenberg, Bert [3 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Guelph Food Res Ctr, Guelph, ON N1G 5C9, Canada
[2] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Biochem, St John, NF A1B 3X9, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Ctr Crop Dev, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
关键词
pea; lentil; chickpea; in vitro starch digestibility; expected glycemic index;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.03.062
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
In vitro starch digestibility, expected glycemic index (eGI), and thermal and pasting properties of flours from pea, lentil and chickpea grown in Canada under identical environmental conditions were investigated. The protein content and gelatinization transition temperatures of lentil flour were higher than those of pea and chickpea flours. Chickpea flour showed a lower amylose content (10.8-13.5%) but higher free lipid content (6.5-7.1%) and amylose-lipid complex melting enthalpy (0.7-0.8 J/g). Significant differences among cultivars within the same species were observed with respect to swelling power, gelatinization properties, pasting properties and in vitro starch digestibility, especially chickpea flour from desi (Myles) and kabuli type (FLIP 97-101C and 97-indian2-11). Lentil flour was hydrolyzed more slowly and to a lesser extent than pea and chickpea flours. The amount of slowly digestible starch (SDS) in chickpea flour was the highest among the pulse flours, but the resistant starch (RS) content was the lowest. The eGI of lentil flour was the lowest among the pulse flours. Crown Copyright (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 321
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
*AACC, 2000, APR METH AACC
[2]   The glycemic index as a measure of health and nutritional quality: An Australian perspective [J].
Brand-Miller, Jennie .
CEREAL FOODS WORLD, 2007, 52 (02) :41-44
[3]   Effect of various processing methods on the in vitro starch digestibility and resistant starch content of Indian pulses [J].
Bravo, L ;
Siddhuraju, P ;
Saura-Calixto, F .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1998, 46 (11) :4667-4674
[4]   Chemical composition, dietary fibre and resistant starch contents of raw and cooked pea, common bean, chickpea and lentil legumes [J].
Costa, GED ;
Queiroz-Monici, KDS ;
Reis, SMPM ;
de Oliveira, AC .
FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2006, 94 (03) :327-330
[5]   Glycaemic index of cereal products explained by their content of rapidly and slowly available glucose [J].
Englyst, KN ;
Vinoy, S ;
Englyst, HN ;
Lang, V .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2003, 89 (03) :329-339
[6]  
*FAO UN, 2005, FAOSTAT DAT AGR
[7]  
FOSTERPOWELL K, 1995, AM J CLIN NUTR, V62, P871
[8]   A starch hydrolysis procedure to estimate glycemic index [J].
Goni, I ;
GarciaAlonso, A ;
SauraCalixto, F .
NUTRITION RESEARCH, 1997, 17 (03) :427-437
[9]  
GRANFELDT Y, 1992, EUR J CLIN NUTR, V46, P649
[10]   In vitro and in vivo hydrolysis of legume starches by α-amylase and resistant starch formation in legumes -: a review [J].
Hoover, R ;
Zhou, Y .
CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS, 2003, 54 (04) :401-417