Source trustworthiness and information processing in multiple message situations: A contextual analysis

被引:22
作者
Tormala, Zakary L. [1 ]
Clarkson, Joshua J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 95305 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1521/soco.2008.26.3.357
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research explores the possibility that when people receive sequential persuasive messages about different issues, the trustworthiness of the source of an early (prior) message can influence people's motivation to process a subsequent (target) message. Participants were presented with a target persuasive message from a source of ambiguous trustworthiness. Preceding this message, participants received a message about a different issue from a source unambiguously high or low in trustworthiness. When primed to focus on similarities, participants showed greater processing of the target message when the prior source was low rather than high in trustworthiness (assimilation). When primed to focus on dissimilarities, participants showed the opposite effect (contrast). As expected, however, these effects were particularly likely to manifest for low need for cognition individuals, who are not otherwise inclined to engage in extensive processing. High need for cognition individuals engaged in extensive processing regardless of the prime and prior source manipulations.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 367
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   MAJORITY AND MINORITY INFLUENCE - SOURCE-POSITION IMBALANCE AS A DETERMINANT OF MESSAGE SCRUTINY [J].
BAKER, SM ;
PETTY, RE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (01) :5-19
[2]   THE NEED FOR COGNITION [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
PETTY, RE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 42 (01) :116-131
[3]   THE EFFICIENT ASSESSMENT OF NEED FOR COGNITION [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
PETTY, RE ;
KAO, CF .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1984, 48 (03) :306-307
[4]   HEURISTIC PROCESSING CAN BIAS SYSTEMATIC PROCESSING - EFFECTS OF SOURCE CREDIBILITY, ARGUMENT AMBIGUITY, AND TASK IMPORTANCE ON ATTITUDE JUDGMENT [J].
CHAIKEN, S ;
MAHESWARAN, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 66 (03) :460-473
[5]  
COHEN J, 2003, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, P31
[6]   Seeing one thing and doing another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior [J].
Dijksterhuis, A ;
Spears, R ;
Postmes, T ;
Stapel, DA ;
Koomen, W ;
van Knippenberg, A ;
Scheepers, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (04) :862-871
[7]   ON THE CONSEQUENCES OF PRIMING - ASSIMILATION AND CONTRAST EFFECTS [J].
HERR, PM ;
SHERMAN, SJ ;
FAZIO, RH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 19 (04) :323-340
[8]  
JARVIS WBG, 2004, MEDIALAB COMPUTER SO
[9]   REINSTATEMENT OF THE COMMUNICATOR IN DELAYED MEASUREMENT OF OPINION CHANGE [J].
KELMAN, HC ;
HOVLAND, CI .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1953, 48 (03) :327-335
[10]   A reflection and evaluation model of comparative thinking [J].
Markman, KD ;
McMullen, MN .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2003, 7 (03) :244-267