Opportunistic screening and clinician-delivered brief intervention for high-risk alcohol use among emergency department attendees: A randomized controlled trial

被引:23
|
作者
Dent, Andrew W. [1 ,2 ]
Weiland, Tracey J. [1 ,2 ]
Phillips, Georgina A. [1 ]
Lee, Nicole K. [3 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Hlth, Emergency Practice Innovat Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Fitzroy, Vic 3068, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Fac Med Dent & Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Turning Point Alcohol & Drug Ctr, Fitzroy, Vic, Australia
关键词
alcohol consumption; brief intervention; emergency medicine; motivational intervention; Paddington alcohol test;
D O I
10.1111/j.1742-6723.2008.01067.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of routine opportunistic screening and brief intervention (BI) by ED staff to reduce high-risk alcohol consumption. Methods: This was an open, randomized controlled trial with allocation blinding performed over 12 months. Using the Paddington Alcohol Test, adult patients were screened for high-risk alcohol use. Consenting patients who were screened positive were eligible for randomization to no counselling (standard care, SC), same-day BI by an emergency nurse or doctor or motivational intervention (MI) within I week by off-site drug and alcohol counsellors. Telephone follow up was performed at I and 3 months. The primary outcome was maximum self-reported daily standard drinks consumed. Analysis was by intention to treat. Results: Of 32 965 eligible patients, 10 274 were screened, 1043 were positive, 468 consented to the study, and 161, 159 and 148 were allocated to SC, BI and MI, respectively. In the MI group, 133 declined intervention or failed to attend. At 3 months, 96, 81 and 74 participants in the SC, BI and MI groups, respectively, were contactable and consented to telephone interview. Overall, maximum daily alcohol consumption decreased from a median of 13.5 standard drinks at enrolment to 9.25 drinks at 3 months. At 3 months, SC participants reported fewer drinks than those randomized to MI. Conclusion: In the present study, neither BI nor MI was better than SC in reducing high-risk alcohol consumption. Uptake of opportunistic screening by ED staff was poor, as was patient compliance with off-site counselling.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 128
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Brief alcohol intervention and alcohol assessment do not influence alcohol use in injured patients treated in the emergency department: a randomized controlled clinical trial (vol 102, pg 1224, 2007)
    Daeppen, Jean-Bernard
    Gaume, Jacques
    Bady, Pierre
    Yersin, Bertrand
    Calmes, Jean-Marie
    Givel, Jean-Claude
    Gmel, Gerhard
    ADDICTION, 2007, 102 (12) : 1995 - 1995
  • [42] Testing the efficacy of a brief sexual risk reduction intervention among high-risk American Indian adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Rachel Chambers
    Lauren Tingey
    Anna Beach
    Allison Barlow
    Anne Rompalo
    BMC Public Health, 16
  • [43] Testing the efficacy of a brief sexual risk reduction intervention among high-risk American Indian adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Chambers, Rachel
    Tingey, Lauren
    Beach, Anna
    Barlow, Allison
    Rompalo, Anne
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 16
  • [44] Randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention for unhealthy alcohol use in hospitalized Taiwanese men
    Liu, Shen-Ing
    Wu, Shu-I
    Chen, Su-Chiu
    Huang, Hui-Chun
    Sun, Fang-Ju
    Fang, Chun-Kai
    Hsu, Chien-Chi
    Huang, Chiu-Ron
    Yeh, Hsiao-Mei
    Shih, Shou-Chuan
    ADDICTION, 2011, 106 (05) : 928 - 940
  • [45] Nurse-Delivered Screening and Brief Intervention Among College Students with Hazardous Alcohol Use: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial from India
    Kamal, Kumar
    Sunita, Sharma
    Karobi, Das
    Abhishek, Ghosh
    ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM, 2020, 55 (03): : 284 - 290
  • [46] Screening and brief intervention for alcohol problems among college students treated in a university hospital emergency department
    Helmkamp, JC
    Hungerford, DW
    Williams, JM
    Manley, WG
    Furbee, PM
    Horn, KA
    Pollock, DA
    JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH, 2003, 52 (01) : 7 - 16
  • [47] A remote brief intervention plus social media messaging for cannabis use among emerging adults: A pilot randomized controlled trial in emergency department patients
    Bonar, Erin E.
    Goldstick, Jason E.
    Tan, Chiu Yi
    Bourque, Carrie
    Carter, Patrick M.
    Duval, Elizabeth R.
    Mcafee, Jenna
    Walton, Maureen A.
    ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2023, 147
  • [48] A Randomized Phase I Trial of a Brief Computer-Delivered Intervention for Alcohol Use During Pregnancy
    Tzilos, Golfo K.
    Sokol, Robert J.
    Ondersma, Steven J.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2011, 20 (10) : 1517 - 1524
  • [49] Effectiveness of a Specialized Brief Intervention for At-risk Drinkers in an Emergency Department: Short-term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bruguera, Pol
    Barrio, Pablo
    Oliveras, Clara
    Braddick, Fleur
    Gavotti, Carolina
    Bruguera, Carla
    Lopez-Pelayo, Hugo
    Miquel, Laia
    Segura, Lidia
    Colom, Joan
    Ortega, Lluisa
    Vieta, Eduard
    Gual, Antoni
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 25 (05) : 517 - 525
  • [50] Randomized controlled trial of Web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care
    Kypri, Kypros
    Langley, John D.
    Saunders, John B.
    Cashell-Smith, Martine L.
    Herbison, Peter
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 168 (05) : 530 - 536