Agriculture, food, and nutrition interventions that facilitate sustainable food production and impact health: an overview of systematic reviews

被引:0
作者
Haby, Michelle M. [1 ]
Chapman, Evelina [2 ]
Clark, Rachel [3 ]
Galvao, Luiz A. C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sonora, Dept Chem & Biol Sci, Hermosillo 83000, Sonora, Mexico
[2] WHO, PAHO, Brazil Country Off, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[3] Ctr Excellence Intervent & Prevent Sci, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[4] WHO, Sustainable Dev & Hlth Equ PAHO, Washington, DC USA
来源
REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH | 2016年 / 40卷 / 01期
关键词
Sustainable development; sustainable agriculture; food and nutrition security; nutrition; public health; review; systematic; Sustainable Development Goals; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; ORGANIC FOODS; OBESITY; POLICY; CONSUMPTION; DISEASE; PRICES; TAXES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. To identify the agriculture, food, and nutrition security interventions that facilitate sustainable food production and have a positive impact on health. Methods. Systematic review methods were used to synthesize evidence from multiple systematic reviews and economic evaluations through a comprehensive search of 17 databases and 10 websites. The search employed a pre-defined protocol with clear inclusion criteria. Both grey and peer-reviewed literature published in English, Spanish, and Portuguese between 1 January 1997 and November 2013 were included. To classify as "sustainable," interventions needed to aim to positively impact at least two dimensions of the integrated framework for sustainable development and include measures of health impact. Results. Fifteen systematic reviews and seven economic evaluations met the inclusion criteria. All interventions had some impact on health or on risk factors for health outcomes, except those related to genetically modified foods. Impact on health inequalities was rarely measured. All interventions with economic evaluations were very cost-effective, had cost savings, or net benefits. In addition to impacting health (inclusive social development), all interventions had the potential to impact on inclusive economic development, and some, on environmental sustainability, though these effects were rarely assessed. Conclusions. What is needed now is careful implementation of interventions with expected positive health impacts but with concurrent, rigorous evaluation. Possible impact on health inequalities needs to be considered and measured by future primary studies and systematic reviews, as does impact of interventions on all dimensions of sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 56
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ENV EC POLICY STUD
[2]  
[Anonymous], EVALUACION EFECTOS A
[3]  
[Anonymous], OUR COMM FUT BRUNDTL
[4]  
[Anonymous], TRAD ENV REV WAK BEF
[5]  
[Anonymous], AGR ENV HLTH SUSTAIN
[6]  
[Anonymous], AGR FOOD NUTR SECURI
[7]  
[Anonymous], FOOD SAF FREQ ASK QU
[8]  
[Anonymous], HLTH TECHNOL ASSESS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, REPORT SUBMITTED SPE
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2010, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, DOI DOI 10.1136/jech.2008.082743