Lumbar Disk Arthroplasty for Degenerative Disk Disease: Literature Review

被引:32
作者
Abi-Hanna, David [1 ]
Kerferd, Jack [1 ]
Phan, Kevin [1 ]
Rao, Prashanth [1 ]
Mobbs, Ralph [1 ]
机构
[1] Prince Wales Private Hosp, NeuroSpine Surg Res Grp, Barker St, Randwick, NSW, Australia
关键词
Artificial disk; Degenerative disk disease; Low back pain; Lumbar arthroplasty; Lumbar fusion; Lumbar spine; Total disk replacement; INVESTIGATIONAL-DEVICE-EXEMPTION; ADJACENT SEGMENT DEGENERATION; METAL-ON-METAL; CHARITE(TM) ARTIFICIAL DISC; MINIMUM FOLLOW-UP; SAGITTAL BALANCE; INTERBODY FUSION; SPINAL SURGERY; MAVERICK DISC; RISK-FACTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.153
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Low back pain is the principal cause of long-term disability worldwide. We intend to address one of its main causes, degenerative disk disease, a spinal condition involving degradation of an intervertebral disk. Following unsuccessful conservative treatment, patients may be recommended for surgery. The two main surgical treatments for lumbar degenerative disk disease are lumbar fusion: traditional standard surgical treatment and lumbar disk arthroplasty, also known as lumbar total disk replacement. Lumbar fusion aims to relieve pain by fusing vertebrae together to eliminate movement at the joint, but it has been criticized for problems involving insignificant pain relief, a reduced range of motion, and an increased risk of adjacent segment degeneration. This leads to development of the lumbar total disk replacement technique, which aims to relieve pain replacing a degenerated intervertebral disk with a moveable prosthesis, thus mimicking the functional anatomy and biomechanics of a native intervertebral disk. Over the years a large range of prosthetic disks has been developed. The efficacy and current evidence for these prostheses are discussed in this review. The results of this study are intended to guide clinical practice and future lumbar total disk replacement device choice and design.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 196
页数:9
相关论文
共 106 条
[21]  
Fassio B, 1978, NOUV PRESSE MED, V21, P4
[22]  
Fernstrom U, 1966, Acta Chir Scand Suppl, V357, P154
[23]  
Foley K.T., 2001, NEUROSURGERY FOCUS, V10, P1, DOI [10.3171/foc.2001.10.4.11, DOI 10.3171/foc.2001.10.4.11, DOI 10.3171/FOC.2001.10.4.11]
[24]   Minimally invasive lumbar fusion [J].
Foley, KT ;
Holly, LT ;
Schwender, JD .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (15) :S26-S35
[25]  
François J, 2007, ACTA ORTHOP BELG, V73, P122
[26]   Prevalence of lumbar total disc replacement candidates in a community-based spinal surgery practice [J].
Fras, Christian I. ;
Auerbach, Joshua D. .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2008, 21 (02) :126-129
[27]   Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Freeman, Brian J. C. ;
Davenport, James .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 :S439-S447
[28]   Lumbar total disc replacement part I: Rationale, biomechanics, and implant types [J].
Frelinghuysen, P ;
Huang, RC ;
Girardi, FP ;
Cammisa, FP .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 36 (03) :293-+
[29]   Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty [J].
Galbusera, Fabio ;
Bellini, Chiara M. ;
Zweig, Thomas ;
Ferguson, Stephen ;
Raimondi, Manuela T. ;
Lamartina, Claudio ;
Brayda-Bruno, Marco ;
Fornari, Maurizio .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (12) :1635-1650
[30]  
Gamradt Seth C, 2005, Spine J, V5, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.09.006