Comparing upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric temperatures: Microwave sounding unit, radiosonde, COSPAR International Reference Atmosphere, and National Center for Environmental Prediction National Center for Atmospheric Research reanalysis monthly mean climatologies

被引:7
作者
Shah, KP [1 ]
Rind, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, Ctr Climate Syst Res, New York, NY 10024 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/98JD02452
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Climate-modeling groups are having to assess their models' temperatures at high, thinly observed altitudes in order to investigate near-tropopause forcings with confidence. To support such analyses, the microwave sounding unit (MSU), GFDL/Oort radiosonde, COSPAR International Reference Atmosphere (CIRA), and new 13-year National Center for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) Reanalysis Project climatologies are intercompared herein in terms of their monthly mean microwave brightness temperatures T-b. In the lower stratosphere these climatologies agree extremely well. Small differences between NCEP/NCAR and MSU T-b centered at about 80 mbar amount to less than or equal to 2 K year round across the tropics and less than or equal to 5 K in southern winter polar latitudes. Artificial land-ocean outlines less than or equal to 2 K do appear in maps of the NCEP/NCAR lower stratospheric T-b between 30 degrees S and 30 degrees N. This NCEP/NCAR land-ocean T-b distinction may be due to sparseness of inputed radiosonde data at lower stratospheric heights not compensated for by satellite retrievals in the NCEP/NCAR assimilation process. In the upper troposphere, good agreement again occurs between the GFDL radiosonde, the CIRA, and the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis T-b. However, the experimental MSU channel 3R climatology has markedly cooler upper tropospheric T-b. Coolness peaks at over 6 K across low latitudes and diminishes to a few kelvins at polar latitudes with little seasonal dependence. The cool bias of the MSU channel 3R is likely due to a combination of channel 3 receiver drift and limb-darkening problems. Latitudinal correction terms are suggested for this experimental, but valuable, MSU product based on comparisons with calculated NCEP/NCAR reanalysis T-b.
引用
收藏
页码:31569 / 31591
页数:23
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
BARNETT JJ, 1985, HDB MAP, V16, P47
[3]  
Basist AN, 1997, B AM METEOROL SOC, V78, P1431, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<1431:COTTDF>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   SOME RESULTS FROM AN INTERCOMPARISON OF THE CLIMATES SIMULATED BY 14 ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS [J].
BOER, GJ ;
ARPE, K ;
BLACKBURN, M ;
DEQUE, M ;
GATES, WL ;
HART, TL ;
LETREUT, H ;
ROECKNER, E ;
SHEININ, DA ;
SIMMONDS, I ;
SMITH, RNB ;
TOKIOKA, T ;
WETHERALD, RT ;
WILLIAMSON, D .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1992, 97 (D12) :12771-12786
[6]  
BOYLE J, 1997, 42 MDI L LIV NATL LA
[7]  
Champion K. S. W., 1985, HDB GEOPHYS SPACE EN
[8]  
*COMM SPAC RES, 1990, ADV SPACE RES, V11
[9]   IMPACTS OF MODEL IMPROVEMENTS ON GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODEL SENSITIVITY TO SEA-SURFACE TEMPERATURE FORCING [J].
DRUYAN, LM ;
SHAH, KP ;
LO, KWK ;
MARENGO, JA ;
RUSSELL, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 1995, 15 (10) :1061-1086
[10]  
Fleming EL, 1988, TM100697 NASA