Assessment of the allergic reaction in seasonal rhinitis: Acoustic rhinometry is a sensitive and objective method

被引:20
作者
Nielsen, LP
Bjerke, T
Christensen, MB
Pedersen, B
Rasmussen, TR
Dahl, R
机构
[1] Allergy Research Laboratory, Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital of Aarhus, Aarhus
关键词
allergic rhinitis; seasonal rhinitis; hayfever; acoustic rhinometry; nasal metacholine challenge; eosinophils; ECP; nasal lavage;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2222.1996.tb00524.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Seasonal allergic rhinitis constitutes an excellent in vivo model of an allergic mucosal inflammatory reaction. This offers the opportunity of studying the fundamentals of allergic inflammation in addition to improvement of knowledge on the basal pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease, So far, monitoring methods of disease activity and treatment efficacy have mainly been based upon subjective assessments, illustrating the impact of introducing reliable objective methods. Objective To investigate the allergic inflammatory reaction of seasonal rhinitis through different objective methods and evaluate these as indicators of disease activity and treatment efficacy. Methods Functional parameters, i.e. acoustic rhinometry and nasal metacholine challenge, and biological markers, i.e. blood eosinophil count, eosinophil cationic protein in serum (s-ECP) and nasal lavage fluid (n-ECP), were assessed before and at peak pollen season in 27 patients with grass pollen induced rhinitis, Patients were randomized to either nasal corticosteroid or placebo treatment and recorded nasal symptom scores. Results Acoustic rhinometry revealed a significant difference in favour of steroid treatment (P < 0.05) comparing nasal volumes before and during season. This difference primarily relied upon a decrease in the placebo group (P= 0.05). A reduction from baseline of s-ECP in the steroid group (P < 0.01) was obtained. N-ECP demonstrated a difference between treatment groups, although not significant. Symptom scores increased in all patients during the pollen season, although this was only significant in the placebo treated patients (P < 0.01). The remaining methods applied did not demonstrate further differences, either within or between treatment groups. Conclusion Our results demonstrate acoustic rhinometry to be a sensitive and objective method of assessment of nasal obstruction, Furthermore, acoustic rhinometry and s-ECP reflect the impact of nasal steroid therapy on seasonal allergic rhinitis.
引用
收藏
页码:1268 / 1275
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] ASTHMA AND ALLERGIC RHINITIS IN SWEDISH CONSCRIPTS
    ABERG, N
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1989, 19 (01) : 59 - 63
  • [2] EOSINOPHILS AND EOSINOPHIL CATIONIC PROTEIN IN NASAL LAVAGES IN ALLERGEN-INDUCED HYPERRESPONSIVENESS - EFFECTS OF TOPICAL GLUCOCORTICOSTEROID TREATMENT
    ANDERSSON, M
    ANDERSSON, P
    VENGE, P
    PIPKORN, U
    [J]. ALLERGY, 1989, 44 (05) : 342 - 348
  • [3] MAJOR BASIC-PROTEIN AND EOSINOPHIL-DERIVED NEUROTOXIN CONCENTRATIONS IN NASAL-LAVAGE FLUID AFTER ANTIGEN CHALLENGE - EFFECT OF SYSTEMIC CORTICOSTEROIDS AND RELATIONSHIP TO EOSINOPHIL INFLUX
    BASCOM, R
    PIPKORN, U
    PROUD, D
    DUNNETTE, S
    GLEICH, GJ
    LICHTENSTEIN, LM
    NACLERIO, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1989, 84 (03) : 338 - 346
  • [4] THE INFLUX OF INFLAMMATORY CELLS INTO NASAL WASHINGS DURING THE LATE RESPONSE TO ANTIGEN CHALLENGE - EFFECT OF SYSTEMIC STEROID PRETREATMENT
    BASCOM, R
    PIPKORN, U
    LICHTENSTEIN, LM
    NACLERIO, RM
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1988, 138 (02): : 406 - 412
  • [5] IMMUNOHISTOLOGY OF THE NASAL-MUCOSA IN SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS - INCREASES IN ACTIVATED EOSINOPHILS AND EPITHELIAL MAST-CELLS
    BENTLEY, AM
    JACOBSON, MR
    CUMBERWORTH, V
    BARKANS, JR
    MOQBEL, R
    SCHWARTZ, LB
    IRANI, AMA
    KAY, AB
    DURHAM, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1992, 89 (04) : 877 - 883
  • [6] STEROID-INDUCED REDUCTION OF HISTAMINE-RELEASE DOES NOT ALTER THE CLINICAL NASAL RESPONSE TO COLD, DRY AIR
    CRUZ, AA
    TOGIAS, AG
    LICHTENSTEIN, LM
    KAGEYSOBOTKA, A
    PROUD, D
    NACLERIO, RM
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1991, 143 (04): : 761 - 765
  • [7] Davies R J, 1991, Clin Exp Allergy, V21 Suppl 1, P248, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1991.tb01736.x
  • [8] DOLOVICH J, 1994, ANN ALLERGY, V73, P147
  • [9] PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES TO INTRANASAL DOSE-RESPONSE CHALLENGES WITH HISTAMINE, METHACHOLINE, BRADYKININ, AND PROSTAGLANDIN IN ADULT VOLUNTEERS WITH AND WITHOUT NASAL ALLERGY
    DOYLE, WJ
    BOEHM, S
    SKONER, DP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1990, 86 (06) : 924 - 935
  • [10] FILIACI F, 1983, Rhinology (Utrecht), V21, P329