Cancer risk management practices of noncarriers within BRCA1/2 mutation -: Positive families in the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast cancer

被引:16
作者
Dawson, Sarah-Jane
Price, Melanie A.
Jenkins, Mark A.
McKinley, Joanne M.
Butow, Phyllis N.
McLachlan, Sue-Anne
Lindeman, Geoffrey J.
Weideman, Prue
Friedlander, Michael L.
Hopper, John L.
Phillips, Kelly-Anne
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Div Haematol & Med Oncol, Melbourne, Vic 8006, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Mol Environm Genet & Analy Epidemiol, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[3] St Vincents Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Fitzroy, Vic 3065, Australia
[4] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Familial Canc Ctr, Parkville, Vic 3050, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med, St Vincent Hosp, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Med Psychol Res Unit, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[7] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0262
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Women from BRCA mutation-positive families who do not carry the family-specific mutation are generally at average cancer risk and therefore do not require intensive risk management. Methods Participants were female noncarriers from BRCA mutation-positive families who had responded to 3 yearly follow-up questionnaires and had chosen to either receive or not receive their genetic test result. In the former group, undertaking mammography younger than age 40 years or more than once every 2 years, clinical breast examination (CBE) more than yearly, breast self-examination (BSE) more than monthly, or any transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) or CA-125 was considered overscreening. Screening behaviors of women who did and did not know their genetic test result were compared. Logistic regression and nonparametric analyses were performed to identify demographic and psychosocial factors (respectively) associated with overscreening. Results Of 325 eligible women, 116 knew their mutation status and 209 did not. For the first group, proportions overscreening were mammography, 53%; CBE, 10%; BSE, 11%; TVU, 7%; and CA-125, 10%. There were no significant differences in screening behaviors between the groups. In those aware of their mutation status, parous women were more likely to overuse mammography (odds ratio [ OR] = 4.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 17; P = .03) and women with one or more first-degree relative with ovarian cancer (OC) were more likely to overuse OC screening (TVU: OR = 6.00; 95% CI, 1.0 to 35.1; P = .047, and CA-125: OR = 6.50; 95% CI, 1.49 to 28.4; P = .013). Conclusion The reasons for overuse of screening (particularly mammography) by mutation noncarriers require additional elucidation given the potential for harm.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 232
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]  
*NAT BREAST CANC C, CLIN BEST PRACT SCRE
[22]   Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility:: Systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force [J].
Nelson, HD ;
Huffman, LH ;
Fu, RW ;
Harris, EL .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 143 (05) :362-379
[23]  
Peshkin BN, 2002, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V11, P1115
[24]   Risk-reducing surgery, screening and chemoprevention practices of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers:: a prospective cohort study [J].
Phillips, K-A ;
Jenkins, M. A. ;
Lindeman, G. J. ;
McLachlan, S. A. ;
McKinley, J. M. ;
Weideman, P. C. ;
Hopper, J. L. ;
Friedlander, M. L. .
CLINICAL GENETICS, 2006, 70 (03) :198-206
[25]   Predictors of participation in clinical and psychosocial follow-up of the kConFab breast cancer family cohort [J].
Phillips, KA ;
Butow, PN ;
Stewart, AE ;
Chang, JH ;
Weideman, PC ;
Price, MA ;
McLachlan, SA ;
Lindeman, GJ ;
McKay, MJ ;
Friedlander, ML ;
Hopper, JL .
FAMILIAL CANCER, 2005, 4 (02) :105-113
[26]   OPTIMISM, COPING, AND HEALTH - ASSESSMENT AND IMPLICATIONS OF GENERALIZED OUTCOME EXPECTANCIES [J].
SCHEIER, MF ;
CARVER, CS .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 4 (03) :219-247
[27]   DISTINGUISHING OPTIMISM FROM NEUROTICISM (AND TRAIT ANXIETY, SELF-MASTERY, AND SELF-ESTEEM) - A REEVALUATION OF THE LIFE ORIENTATION TEST [J].
SCHEIER, MF ;
CARVER, CS ;
BRIDGES, MW .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (06) :1063-1078
[28]   Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening following BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing [J].
Schwartz, MD ;
Kaufman, E ;
Peshkin, BN ;
Isaacs, C ;
Hughes, C ;
DeMarco, T ;
Finch, C ;
Lerman, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (21) :4034-4041
[29]   Breast cancer mortality trends in Australia: 1921 to 1994 [J].
Smith, CL ;
Kricker, A ;
Armstrong, BK .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1998, 168 (01) :11-14
[30]   American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006 [J].
Smith, RA ;
Cokkinides, V ;
Eyre, HJ .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2006, 56 (01) :11-25