Model-based analyses of chromate, selenate and sulfate reduction in a methane-based membrane biofilm reactor

被引:8
作者
Wang, Zhen [1 ]
Chen, Xueming [2 ]
Zhao, He-Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Environm & Resource Sci, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fuzhou Univ, Coll Environm & Resources, Fujian Prov Engn Res Ctr Rural Waste Recycling Te, Fuzhou 350116, Fujian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chromate; Membrane biofilm reactor; Methane; Model analysis; Selenate; WASTE-WATER; NITROGEN REMOVAL; BIOREDUCTION; POLLUTION; CHROMIUM; NITRATE; CR(VI); DENITRIFICATION; PERCHLORATE; OXIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2021.106925
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Selenate (SeO42- ) and sulfate (SO42- ) are frequently present together with chromate (CrO42- ) in certain industrial wastewaters. SeO42- and CrO42- are required to be reduced while SO42- reduction should be minimized to avoid the production of toxic sulfide. In this study, a modified biofilm model was employed to investigate the interactions between CrO42-, SeO42- and SO42- bioreduction in a methane (CH4)-based membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR). The model was calibrated using steady-state experimental data of two reported CH4-based MBfRs reducing these oxyanions. The modeling results suggested that the majority of methanotrophs ( 80%) were located in the outer layer of the biofilm, while the oxyanions-reducing bacteria preferred to grow close to the membrane. The introduction of SeO42- or SO42- enriched selenate/sulfate-reducing bacteria (SeRB/SRB) but decreased the abundance of chromate-reducing bacteria (CRB). A biofilm thickness of >300 mu m, an HRT of higher than 4 h and an influent dissolved oxygen concentration of 0.3 mg /L were favorable for simultaneous high-level CrO42- and SeO42- removal. A two-stage MBfR system with optimized operational conditions showed promise in retaining high-purity (>98%) selenium nanoparticles when treating both CrO42- and SeO42impacted wastewaters. Moreover, the model indicated that efficient CrO42- removal (>90%) along with minor SO42- reduction (<10%) could be realized via maintaining appropriate biofilm thickness (200-250 mu m) and influent dissolved oxygen (0.7-0.8 mg /L) in a single MBfR. These findings offer insights for the design and operation of CH4-based technology for remediating CrO42- contaminated industrial wastewaters.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ADV AGRONOMY, V120, P129
[2]   Selenium [J].
Barceloux, DG .
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY-CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1999, 37 (02) :145-172
[3]   A review of chemical, electrochemical and biological methods for aqueous Cr(VI) reduction [J].
Barrera-Diaz, Carlos E. ;
Lugo-Lugo, Violeta ;
Bilyeu, Bryan .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2012, 223 :1-12
[4]   Perchlorate, nitrate, and sulfate reduction in hydrogen-based membrane biofilm reactor: Model-based evaluation [J].
Chen, Xueming ;
Liu, Yiwen ;
Peng, Lai ;
Ni, Bing-Jie .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2017, 316 :82-90
[5]   Achieving complete nitrogen removal by coupling nitritation-anammox and methane-dependent denitrification: A model-based study [J].
Chen, Xueming ;
Guo, Jianhua ;
Xie, Guo-Jun ;
Yuan, Zhiguo ;
Ni, Bing-Jie .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2016, 113 (05) :1035-1045
[6]   Community structure and function in a H2-based membrane biofilm reactor capable of bioreduction of selenate and chromate [J].
Chung, Jinwook ;
Ryu, Hodon ;
Abbaszadegan, Morteza ;
Rittmann, Bruce E. .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 72 (06) :1330-1339
[7]   Organic Matter Removal in a Membrane-Aerated Biofilm Reactor [J].
da Silva, Tatiana Santos ;
Matsumoto, Tsunao ;
dos Anjos, Mariane Luz ;
Albertin, Liliane Lazzari .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 144 (08)
[8]  
Falkentoft CM, 2001, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V76, P77, DOI 10.1002/bit.1028.abs
[9]   Removal of chromate anions by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration using cationic surfactants [J].
Gzara, L ;
Dhahbi, M .
DESALINATION, 2001, 137 (1-3) :241-250
[10]   Globally sustainable manganese metal production and use [J].
Hagelstein, Karen .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (12) :3736-3740