Farm-SAFE: the process of developing a plot- and farm-scale model of arable, forestry, and silvoarable economics

被引:28
作者
Graves, A. R. [1 ]
Burgess, P. J. [1 ]
Liagre, F. [2 ]
Terreaux, J. -P. [3 ]
Borrel, T. [4 ]
Dupraz, C. [4 ]
Palma, J. [5 ]
Herzog, F. [6 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[2] Assemblee Permanente Chambres Agr, F-75008 Paris, France
[3] Irstea, F-34196 Montpellier 5, France
[4] INRA, F-34060 Montpellier, France
[5] Univ Tecn Lisboa, P-1349017 Lisbon, Portugal
[6] Agroscope Reckenholz Tanikon Res Stn ART, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Cost-benefit analysis; Net present value; Economic analysis; Economic model; Equivalent annual value; PARAMETER-SPARSE; YIELD-SAFE; AGROFORESTRY; PERCEPTIONS; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS; LAND;
D O I
10.1007/s10457-010-9363-2
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Financial feasibility and financial return are two key issues that farmers and land owners consider when deciding between alternative land uses such as arable farming, forestry and agroforestry. Moreover regional variations in yields, prices and government grants mean that the relative revenue and cost of such systems can vary substantially within Europe. To aid our understanding of these variations, the European Commission sponsored a research project called "Silvoarable Agroforestry For Europe" (SAFE). This paper describes the process of developing a new economic model within that project. The initial stages included establishing criteria for the model with end-users and reviewing the literature and existing models. This indicated that the economic model needed to allow comparison of arable farming, forestry and agroforestry systems at a plot-and a farm-scale. The form of comparisons included net margins, net present values, infinite net present values, equivalent annual values, and labour requirements. It was decided that the model would operate in a spreadsheet format, and the effect of phased planting patterns would be included at a farm-scale. Following initial development, additional user feedback led to a final choice on a model name, a final method of collating input data, and the inclusion of field-based operations such as varying the cropped area, replacing dead trees, and pruning. In addition options in terms of improved graphical outputs and the ability to undertake sensitivity analysis were developed. Some of the key lessons learnt include the need to establish clear model criteria and the benefits of developing a working prototype at an early stage to gain user-feedback.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 108
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands [J].
Agbenyega, Olivia ;
Burgess, Paul J. ;
Cook, Matthew ;
Morris, Joe .
LAND USE POLICY, 2009, 26 (03) :551-557
[2]  
*AGR W AUSTR CAMPB, 2000, RIRDC PUBL
[3]  
[Anonymous], FARM WOODLANDS FUTUR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
[5]  
Burgess P.J., 2003, IMPACT SILVOARABLE A
[6]   Poplar (Populus spp) growth and crop yields in a silvoarable experiment at three lowland sites in England [J].
Burgess, PJ ;
Incoll, LD ;
Corry, DT ;
Beaton, A ;
Hart, BJ .
AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2005, 63 (02) :157-169
[7]  
*DEC INC, 2005, CRYST BALL 7 RISK AN
[8]  
Dupraz C., 1997, Temperate agroforestry systems., P181
[9]  
Dupraz C., 2005, SAFE (Silvoarable Agroforestry for Europe) Final Report. SAFE Project (August 2001-January 2005
[10]  
DUPRAZ C, 1995, PERSPECTIVES DIVERSI