Medical and elective fertility preservation: impact of removal of the experimental label from oocyte cryopreservation

被引:14
作者
Schon, Samantha B. [1 ,2 ]
Shapiro, Maren [3 ,4 ]
Gracia, Clarisa [2 ]
Senapati, Suneeta [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, 3701 Market St,Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, L4000 UH South,1500 E Med Ctr Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, 3701 Market St,Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Fertility preservation; Oocyte cryopreservation; IVF; ASRM guidelines; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; OVARIAN STIMULATION; CANCER-PATIENTS; AGE; WOMEN; VITRIFICATION; HYPERSTIMULATION; EXPERIENCE; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-017-0968-5
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare baseline characteristics and ovarian stimulation outcomes between patients presenting for medically indicated vs. elective fertility preservation consultation and to determine the impact of the 2013 ASRM guidelines on oocyte cryopreservation on the patient population presenting for fertility preservation consultation. Retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic center. Study population included 332 patients presenting for medically indicated fertility preservation consultation and 210 patients presenting for elective consultation. Patients presenting for elective fertility preservation consultation were more likely to be of advanced age, non-Caucasian, highly educated, single, nulligravid, and meet criteria for diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Additionally, patients presenting electively were more likely to have fertility insurance benefits. A higher percentage of patients with insurance benefits for oocyte cryopreservation proceeded to stimulation. There were no differences in stimulation parameters or number of retrieved oocytes between the groups when adjusted for age. Following release of the ASRM guidelines on oocyte cryopreservation, there was no difference in the percentage of patients in the medical group who proceeded with stimulation; however, a higher percentage of patients presenting electively underwent ovarian stimulation. Although the populations presenting for medical compared with elective fertility preservation differ at baseline, ovarian stimulation parameters and outcomes are similar when adjusted for age. Insurance benefits for fertility preservation are not comprehensive and impact the decision to proceed with stimulation in all patients. The publication of the ASRM guidelines on oocyte cryopreservation increased utilization of this technology among patients presenting electively; however, they remained at an advanced age and with decreased ovarian reserve parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1215
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Effects of cancer on ovarian response in controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation [J].
Almog, Benny ;
Azem, Foad ;
Gordon, David ;
Pauzner, David ;
Amit, Ami ;
Barkan, Gali ;
Levin, Ishai .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 98 (04) :957-960
[2]   Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline [J].
不详 .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (01) :37-43
[3]   Oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons: demographic profile and disposal intentions of UK users [J].
Baldwin, Kylie ;
Culley, Lorraine ;
Hudson, Nicky ;
Mitchell, Helene ;
Lavery, Stuart .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2015, 31 (02) :239-245
[4]   Reproductive technology and the life course: Current debates and research in social egg freezing [J].
Baldwin, Kylie ;
Culley, Lorraine ;
Hudson, Nicky ;
Mitchell, Helene .
HUMAN FERTILITY, 2014, 17 (03) :170-179
[5]   An assessment of female university students' attitudes toward screening technologies for ovarian reserve [J].
Bavan, Brindha ;
Porzig, Ellen ;
Baker, Valerie L. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (05) :1195-1199
[6]   Ovarian stimulation and in-vitro fertilization outcomes of cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation compared to age matched controls: a 17-year experience [J].
Cardozo, Eden R. ;
Thomson, Alexcis P. ;
Karmon, Anatte E. ;
Dickinson, Kristy A. ;
Wright, Diane L. ;
Sabatini, Mary E. .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2015, 32 (04) :587-596
[7]   Outcomes of ovarian stimulation after treatment with chemotherapy [J].
Chan, Jessica L. ;
Johnson, Lauren N. C. ;
Efymow, Brenda L. ;
Sammel, Mary D. ;
Gracia, Clarisa R. .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2015, 32 (10) :1537-1545
[8]   Oocyte Cryopreservation as a Preventive Measure for Age-Related Fertility Loss [J].
Cil, Aylin Pelin ;
Turkgeldi, Lale ;
Seli, Emre .
SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 33 (06) :429-435
[9]   Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation [J].
Cobo, Ana ;
Garcia-Velasco, Juan A. ;
Coello, Aila ;
Domingo, Javier ;
Pellicer, Antonio ;
Remohi, Jose .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 105 (03) :755-+
[10]   Childless women's beliefs and knowledge about oocyte freezing for social and medical reasons [J].
Daniluk, J. C. ;
Koert, E. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (10) :2313-2320