Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria

被引:7
作者
Jainta, Stephanie [1 ]
Joss, Joelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Northwestern Switzerland, Inst Optometry, Windisch, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
binocular coordination; reading; binocular advantages; eye movement; heterophoria; optometric tests; VERGENCE; ADAPTATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; COORDINATION; DISPARITY; CONTRAST; WORDS;
D O I
10.16910/jemr.12.4.10
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Reading with two eyes necessitates efficient processes of binocular vision, which provide a single percept of the text. These processes come with a binocular advantage: binocular reading shows shorter average fixation durations and sentence reading times when compared to monocular reading. A couple of years ago, we showed for a small sample (N=13) that binocular advantages critically relate to the individual heterophoria (the resting state of vergence). In the present, large-scale replication we collected binocular eye movements (Eye-link II) for 94 participants who read 20 sentences monocularly and 20 sentences binocularly. Further, individual heterophorias were determined using three different optometric standards: objective eye tracking (EyeLink II at 60 cm), Maddox wing test (at 30 cm) and measures following the "Guidelines for the application of the Measuring and Correcting Methodology after H.-J. Haase" (MCH; at 6 m). Binocular eye movements showed typical pattern and we replicated (1) binocular advantages of about 25 ms for average fixation durations and (2) a reduction in binocular advantages when heterophoria increased - but only when heterophoria was identified by EyeLink II or Maddox wing measures; MCH measures of heterophoria did not affect binocular advantages in reading. For large heterophorias binocular reading even turned into a disadvantage. Implications for effect estimations and optometric testing will be discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, MIXED EFFECTS MODELS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CLIN MANAGEMENT BINO
[3]   Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Davidson, D. J. ;
Bates, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :390-412
[4]  
BIRNBAUM MH, 1985, AM J OPTOM PHYS OPT, V62, P732
[5]   Binocular vision [J].
Blake, Randolph ;
Wilson, Hugh .
VISION RESEARCH, 2011, 51 (07) :754-770
[6]   The effective fusional range for words in a natural viewing situation [J].
Blythe, Hazel I. ;
Liversedge, Simon P. ;
Findlay, John M. .
VISION RESEARCH, 2010, 50 (16) :1559-1570
[7]   Horizontal and vertical prism adaptation are different mechanisms [J].
Brautaset, RL ;
Jennings, JAM .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2005, 25 (03) :215-218
[8]   Reading performance is not affected by a prism induced increase of horizontal and vertical vergence demand [J].
Dysli, Muriel ;
Vogel, Nicolas ;
Abegg, Mathias .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
[9]   Eye preference within the context of binocular functions [J].
Ehrenstein, WH ;
Arnold-Schulz-Gahmen, BE ;
Jaschinski, W .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 243 (09) :926-932
[10]  
Evans BJW., 2007, Pickwell's Binocular Vision Anomalies, V5