Planning training seminars in palliative care: a cross-sectional survey on the preferences of general practitioners and nurses in Austria

被引:15
作者
Becker, Gerhild [1 ,2 ]
Momm, Felix [2 ]
Deibert, Peter [2 ]
Xander, Carola [2 ]
Gigl, Annemarie [3 ]
Wagner, Brigitte
Baumgartner, Johann [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Dept Internal Med 2, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Palliat Care Res Grp, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Natl Assoc Styria, Graz, Austria
[4] KAGes Serv Graz, Graz, Austria
关键词
AFFECTING RESPONSE RATES; TERMINALLY-ILL PATIENTS; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; LIFE CARE; NEEDS; COMPETENCE; KNOWLEDGE; END; MANAGEMENT; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6920-10-43
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Training in palliative care is frequently requested by health care professionals. However, little is known in detail about the subject matters and the educational preferences of physicians and staff or assistant nurses in this field. Methods: All 897 registered GPs and all 933 registered home care nurses in the district of Steiermark/Austria were sent postal questionnaires. Results: Results from 546 (30%) respondents revealed that GPs prefer evening courses and weekend seminars, whereas staff and assistant nurses prefer one-day courses. Multidisciplinary sessions are preferred by almost 80% of all professional groups. GPs preferred multi disciplinary groups most frequently when addressing psychosocial needs (88.8%) and ethical questions (85.8%). Staff and assistant nurses preferred multidisciplinary groups most frequently in the area of pain management (88%) and opted for multi disciplinary learning to a significantly higher extent than GPs (69%; p < 0.01). Those topics were ranked first which are not only deepening, but supplementing the professional training. On average, GPs were willing to spend a maximum amount of (sic) 400 per year for training seminars in palliative care, whereas nurses would spend approximately (sic) 190 for such classes. The results provide a detailed analysis of the preferences of GPs and nurses and offer guidance for the organisation of training seminars in palliative care. Conclusions: Medical and nursing education programs often pursue separate paths. Yet our findings indicate that in palliative care multidisciplinary training seminars are favoured by both, doctors and nurses. Also, both groups prefer topics that are not only deepening, but supplementing their professional knowledge.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, OUR HLTH OUR CAR OUR
[2]  
Barclay S, 1997, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V47, P800
[3]   Competency and educational needs in palliative care [J].
Becker, Gerhild ;
Momm, Felix ;
Gigl, Annemarie ;
Wagner, Brigitte ;
Baumgartner, Johann .
WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2007, 119 (3-4) :112-116
[4]  
Bender W, 1994, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V138, P1874
[5]  
Bliss SCAWJ., 2000, J INTERPROF CARE, V14, P281, DOI DOI 10.1080/713678572
[6]   Management of terminal cancer patients:: attitudes and training needs of primary health care doctors and nurses [J].
Cantó, ME ;
Cánaves, JL ;
Xamena, JM ;
Amengual, MD .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2000, 8 (06) :464-471
[7]  
CARTWRIGHT A, 1991, J PUBLIC HEALTH MED, V13, P81
[8]  
Charlton R, 2000, MED EDUC, V34, P928
[9]  
*DEP HLTH, 2006, NHS CANC PLAN
[10]   Frequency and perceived competence in providing palliative care to terminally ill patients: A survey of primary care physicians [J].
Farber, NJ ;
Urban, SY ;
Collier, VU ;
Metzger, M ;
Weiner, J ;
Boyer, EG .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2004, 28 (04) :364-372