Possibilities and limitations of fibrin glue usage in nephron-sparing surgery: Experimental study

被引:5
|
作者
Stojkovic, I [1 ]
Savic, V
Djokic, M
Balint, B
Ljubenovic, S
Ignjatovic, I
机构
[1] Clin Ctr Nis, Urol Clin, Dept Urol, YU-18000 Nish, Serbia Monteneg, Serbia
[2] Fac Med, Inst Expt Med, Nish, Serbia
[3] Inst Urol & Nephrol, Belgrade, Serbia And Mont, Serbia
[4] Mil Med Acad, YU-11002 Belgrade, Serbia And Mont, Serbia
关键词
nephron-sparing surgery; fibrin glue; hemostasis;
D O I
10.1159/000084438
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The possibilities and limitations of fibrin glue (FG) usage in nephron-sparing surgery were studied. Materials and Methods: A prospective experimental study was carried out in 50 pigs: 30 with polar resection, and 20 with mediorenal wedge resection of the kidney. Hemostatic sutures, FG, and FG with a muscle 'cup' in animals with polar resection of the kidney were compared. FG and sutures in animals with the wedge resection of the kidney were studied as well. Bleeding, hot ischemia time, complication rate, and additional scarring were also analyzed. Results: Suture hemostasis is safe but with significant adverse effects in both polar and wedge resection of kidney. FG was not efficient as a sole hemostatic agent for polar resection. It was as efficient as hemostatic suture for wedge resection of the kidney. FG with a muscle 'cup' on a pole of the kidney achieved good results in animals with polar resection of the kidney. Histological analysis confirmed better results with FG because of both the less intense and smaller area of additional scarring. Conclusion: FG is a reliable and efficient hemostatic agent for nephron-sparing surgery whenever both sided gluing is possible. Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 360
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nephron-sparing surgery
    Becker, F.
    Siemer, S.
    Rotering, J.
    Suttmann, H.
    Stoeckle, M.
    UROLOGE, 2008, 47 (02): : 215 - 222
  • [2] Nephron-Sparing Surgery 2012
    Janssen, M.
    Treiyer, E. A.
    Saar, M.
    Ohlmann, C. -H.
    Kamradt, J.
    Junker, K.
    Stoeckle, M.
    Siemer, S.
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2012, 43 (06) : 399 - 402
  • [3] Evaluation of Hemostatic Aids in Laparoscopic Nephron-Sparing Surgery
    Binsaleh, Saleh
    THESCIENTIFICWORLDJOURNAL, 2011, 11 : 133 - 141
  • [4] Nephron-sparing surgery for Wilms tumor
    Murphy, Andrew J.
    Davidoff, Andrew M.
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11
  • [5] Nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy for kidney tumors: benefits and limitations
    Roos, Frederik C.
    Thomas, Christian
    Hampel, Christian
    Thueroff, Joachim W.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2011, 11 (06) : 805 - 808
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of nephron-sparing surgery
    Van Poppel, Hein
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (04) : 314 - 326
  • [7] Nephron-sparing surgery for bilateral Wilms tumor
    Kieran, Kathleen
    Davidoff, Andrew M.
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 31 (03) : 229 - 236
  • [8] Computed tomography after nephron-sparing surgery
    Comai, Alessio
    Trenti, M.
    Mayr, R.
    Pycha, A.
    Bonatti, G.
    Lodde, M.
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (07): : 2424 - 2431
  • [9] Nephron-sparing surgery for bilateral Wilms tumor
    Kathleen Kieran
    Andrew M. Davidoff
    Pediatric Surgery International, 2015, 31 : 229 - 236
  • [10] Nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery - how to decide?
    Luczynska, Elzbieta
    Dyczek, Sonia
    Heinze-Paluchowska, Sylwia
    Komorowski, Artur
    Pawlik, Tomasz
    Wysocki, Wojciech
    Klimek, Malgorzata
    WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY, 2013, 17 (01): : 88 - 93