Waste-to-energy effect in municipal solid waste treatment for small cities in Brazil

被引:13
作者
Padilha, Jesse Luis [1 ]
Mesquita, Andre Luiz Amarante [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Para, Amazon Dev Ctr Engn NDAE, Lab Fluid Dynam & Particulate FluidPar, Tucurui, PA, Brazil
关键词
Waste-to-energy; Municipal solid waste; Rate payers ? contribution; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; METHANE EMISSION; LANDFILL GAS; MANAGEMENT; GASIFICATION; INCINERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115743
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The most common urban solid waste disposal in Brazil is the landfill. Additionally, there are still inadequate disposal units (dumps), but there are technological alternatives for this disposal and some projects are already installed in Brazil. The economic analysis is therefore fundamental to find the best technological option, transforming an environmental problem into a viable solution. This work presents a brief review of recent literature on Waste-to-Energy technologies, projects in operation in Brazil and proposes an innovative approach to analyzing the financial viability of the combination of consolidated destinations for the management of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) (technological routes), that use waste to energy, considering the complementation of revenues for small cities with populations from 30,000 to 250,000 residents, through the implementation of a rate-payers contribution optimization algorithm. A structured algorithm was used with a focus on estimating revenue from the minimum value of rate payers' contributions (RPC) to make these routes viable for most cities considered in the project. Economic indicators used include: Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Discounted Payback Period (DPP), and Leveled Cost of Electricity (LCOE). A sensitivity analysis of the two best routes was performed (depending on lower RPC values) based on NPV. The results tend to confirm solutions that can be approved not only by the government, but also by the business sector. The best outcomes are the routes with landfill and landfill gas, and with recycling and anaerobic digestion, considering the sale of digestate and landfill. These presented the best financial values, with discounted payback periods of 15 and 20 years, maximum RPC of US$0.04 and US$0.33, per inhabitant/month, respectively, with an IRR of 11.61%, for both. The sensitivity analysis indicated a greater influence on the investment costs of landfill gas for the first route and for the second route, the urban collection and cleaning services.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] [Aalde H. IPCC IPCC], 2006, Technical report, V4, P83
  • [2] ABREN, CONTR CONS PUBL NO 0
  • [3] Regional landfills methane emission inventory in Malaysia
    Abushammala, Mohammed F. M.
    Basri, Noor Ezlin Ahmad
    Basri, Hassan
    El-Shafie, Ahmed Hussein
    Kadhum, Abdul Amir H.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2011, 29 (08) : 863 - 873
  • [4] Municipal Solid Waste as a Source of Electric Power Generation in Colombia: A Techno-Economic Evaluation under Different Scenarios
    Alzate, Santiago
    Restrepo-Cuestas, Bonie
    Jaramillo-Duque, Alvaro
    [J]. RESOURCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (01):
  • [5] Assessment of Government Incentives for Energy from Waste in Colombia
    Alzate-Arias, Santiago
    Jaramillo-Duque, Alvaro
    Villada, Fernando
    Restrepo-Cuestas, Bonie
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (04)
  • [6] ANEEL, 2015, Resolucao Normativa n 687
  • [7] ANEEL AN de EE, SIST INF GER ANEEL S
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2014, DEA162014 EPE
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2012, Resolucao Normativa ANEEL n. 482
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2015, EST CUST VIAB U DEST